Affiliation:
1. Institute of Psychology University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
2. Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
3. Psychiatry Clinic of Tartu University Hospital Tartu Estonia
Abstract
AbstractAimValidated assessment tools are needed to identify clinically high risk for psychosis. This study aimed to validate the early recognition inventory ERIraos, which consists of the ERIraos Checklist for risk screening and the ERIraos Symptom List for a more thorough risk assessment in the Estonian language to detect psychotic prodromal symptoms.MethodsA prospective cohort study provided an opportunity to evaluate the characteristics of the ERIraos instrument in predicting the increased risk of a psychotic disorder in the future. The 177 study participants, aged 13–42 years old, were divided into groups without an increased risk and three risk groups with different risk severity levels based on the ERIraos Symptom List assessment.ResultsThe results indicated excellent inter‐rater reliability for the ERIraos Symptom List total score. The ability of the ERIraos checklist to screen persons with an elevated psychosis risk was very good (ROC‐AUC = 0.86). The capability of the ERIraos Symptom List scores to predict the probability of transitioning to psychosis within 2 years was very good (ROC‐AUC = 0.83). Brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms and observable behavioural and affective symptoms were statistically significant predictors of transition to psychosis. There were strong and statistically significant correlations between the ERIraos Symptom List scores and other clinical measures assessing functioning and psychopathology.ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate the reliability and validity of the Estonian version of the ERIraos instrument and support the usability of ERIraos as a two‐step tool for the early recognition of psychosis risk.
Reference37 articles.
1. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing;Benjamini Y.;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological),1995
2. The clinical global impressions scale: Applying a research tool in clinical practice;Busner J.;Psychiatry,2007
3. An individualized risk calculator for research in prodromal psychosis;Cannon T. D.;American Journal of Psychiatry,2016
4. Gender and duration of untreated psychosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis;Cascio M. T.;Early Intervention in Psychiatry,2012
5. Early intervention in psychosis: A feasibility study financed by the Italian center on control of maladies;Cocchi A.;Early Intervention in Psychiatry,2015