Affiliation:
1. UWA School of Agriculture and Environment The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia
2. Cooperative Research Centre for High Performance Soil Newcastle New South Wales Australia
3. The UWA Institute of Agriculture The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia
4. Richgro Garden Products Perth Western Australia Australia
5. Centre for Agricultural Engineering University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba Queensland Australia
Abstract
AbstractApproximately one‐third of all food produced globally goes to waste, highlighting the need for sustainable waste management technologies like composting and anaerobic digestion. These technologies convert food waste into soil amendment products such as compost, liquid digestate (LD) and solid digestate (SD). However, these food waste‐derived soil amendments have relatively low nutrient contents compared with synthetic nitrogen (N) fertilizers such as urea, making their agricultural use challenging. Despite this, food waste‐derived soil amendments can enhance the physical and biological properties of soil, potentially creating synergistic effects when combined with synthetic N fertilizers. This study aimed to investigate effects of food waste‐derived amendments in soil applied at 50 kg ha−1 total N (compost, LD or SD) and synthetic N fertilizer [urea ammonium nitrate (UAN)] at 50 and 100 kg ha−1 total N. Over 56 days of soil incubation, greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O), soil chemistry (–N, –N, pH) and microbial biomass C (MBC) were measured. Results showed that LD + UAN 50 reduced cumulative N2O emissions by 23% compared with UAN 100, despite having the same total N and similar available N rate applied to soil. Replacing UAN with LD in farming practices can supply equivalent available N while lowering N2O emissions, offering a sustainable nutrient strategy. Moreover, applying food waste‐derived soil amendments can enhance N retention in soils, reducing the need for increased applications of synthetic N fertilizers to compensate for N deficits in farming. Food waste‐derived soil amendments can also act as a slower N release compared with UAN, reducing nitrogen run‐off. SD had the highest CO2 emissions, followed by LD and compost. SD + UAN 50 increased MBC levels because of higher carbon content and labile carbon, and available N because of the application of UAN. The major drawback of using SD compared with LD is that the process of evaporating LD to form SD causes high ammonia volatilization (ammonium in solution into ammonia gas) rates, reducing the available N in SD. Therefore, future studies should explore strategies to reduce ammonia volatilization of LD.