The efficacy of utility functions for multicriteria hospital case‐mix planning

Abstract

AbstractA new approach to perform hospital case‐mix planning (CMP) is introduced in this article. Our multicriteria approach utilizes utility functions (UF) to articulate the preferences and standpoint of independent decision makers regarding outputs. The primary aim of this article is to test whether a utility functions method (UFM) based on the scalarization of aforesaid UF is an appropriate quantitative technique to (i) distribute hospital resources to different operating units and (ii) provide a better capacity allocation and case mix. Our approach is motivated by the need to provide a method able to evaluate the trade‐off between different stakeholders and objectives of hospitals. To the best of our knowledge, no such approach has been considered before in the literature. As we will later show, this idea addresses various technical limitations, weaknesses, and flaws in current CMP. The efficacy of the aforesaid approach is tested on a case study of a large tertiary hospital. Currently UF are not used by hospital managers, and real functions are unavailable, hence, 14 rational options are tested. Our exploratory analysis has provided important guidelines for the application of these UF. It indicates that these UF provide a valuable starting point for planners, managers, and executives of hospitals to impose their goals and aspirations. In conclusion, our approach may be better at identifying case mix that users want to treat and seems more capable of modeling the varying importance of different levels of output. Apart from finding desirable case mixes to consider, the approach can provide important insights via a sensitivity analysis of the parameters of each UF.