Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Fixation with Pre‐Bent Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails for the Treatment of Distal Radius Metaphyseal Diaphysis Junction Fractures in Children

Abstract

ObjectiveAlthough mini‐plate fixation is an attractive treatment option for distal radius metaphyseal diaphysis junction (DRMDJ) fractures in children, the benefits of minimally invasive fixation (MIF) with pre‐bent elastic stable intramedullary nails (MIF) remain underexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of MIF administration in children with DRMDJ fractures.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 40 patients with DRMDJ fractures who underwent MIF or mini‐plate fixation from January 2016 to January 2021. Radiographic parameters, such as palmar inclination and ulnar deflection angle, were examined postoperatively to assess the anatomical reduction of the wrist joint. Clinical outcomes, including the range of wrist flexion and back extension, were examined to analyze the recovery of the wrist range of motion. Additionally, the Gartland–Werley scoring system was used to assess the recovery status of wrist function and healing condition. The student t‐test and χ2 test were used to compare differences among groups.ResultsAll included patients successfully underwent the operation and were followed up for 12–24 months. Patients in the MIF group had a smaller surgical incision length (0.49 ± 0.06 cm) compared to those in the mini‐plate fixation group (4.41 ± 0.73 cm) (t = 22.438, p = 0.000). Palmar inclination and ulnar deflection were within the normal range in patients of both groups, and the fractures were successfully anatomically reduced. Moreover, wrist flexion and back extension in the MIF group and mini‐plate group were (72.50° ± 0.64° vs. 70.18° ± 0.56°) and (59.55° ± 1.75° vs. 60.04° ± 1.37°), and differences were statistically significant (t = 2.708, p = 0.010 and t = 0.885, p = 0.382, respectively). Furthermore, MIF treatment resulted in a higher proportion of excellent Gartland–Werley scores (94.44%) than mini‐plate fixation (86.36%) (p = 0.390). In addition, one case in the mini‐plate fixation group experienced re‐fracture following the removal of the internal fixation, and the fracture healed after reduction and cast fixation. All patients achieved satisfactory bone healing without other complications.ConclusionCompared with mini‐plate fixation, MIF has the advantages of small incision length, superior range of motion of thr wrist joint, and better maintenance of the physiological radian, providing a promising approach for clinical and surgical treatment of DRMDJ fractures.