Youth support for direct versus talk‐centric democratic processes in Finland

Author:

Huttunen Janette1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Social Science Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, Business and Economics, and Law Åbo Akademi University Åbo Finland

Abstract

AbstractGrowing worries over young people's lack of engagement in institutionalized political processes have been appeased by theories of young people's political preferences for alternative, more engaged political activities. However, young people's institutionalized participation is important for the quality of participation. Democratic innovations, institutions that are designed to increase citizen participation, have been suggested as one solution to bring young people back into institutionalized politics. However, in research, different forms of democratic innovations are often treated as a bulk measure and not examined separatelydepriving us of knowledge of youth support for different types of participatory processes. This paper contributes to the literature by examining youth support for a direct versus talk‐centric democratic process in Finland. The results indicate that young people support both referendums and discussion forums more than older people do and that discussion forums are more popular than referendums. Additionally, democratic satisfaction has a reversed effect on support for discussion forums for young and old people.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference63 articles.

1. Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy

2. Bäck M. Kestilä‐Kekkonen E. &Söderlund P.(2016).Suomalaisten poliittinen luottamus ja siihen vaikuttavat tekijät. InK.Grönlund&H.Wass(Eds.) Poliittisen osallistumisen eriytyminen—Eduskuntavaalit 2015(pp.379–397).Oikeusministeriö.

3. Citizens' perceptions of political processes. A critical evaluation of preference consistency and survey items

4. Ideals and Actions: Do Citizens’ Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to their Conceptions of Democracy?

5. Direct Democracy and its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and ‘Stealth’ Democracy in Finland

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3