Glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver‐related mortality in patients with diabetes

Author:

Mao Xianhua12,Cheung Ka‐Shing12ORCID,Tan Jing‐Tong1,Mak Lung‐Yi13,Lee Chi‐Ho1ORCID,Chiang Chi‐Leung4,Cheng Ho‐Ming1,Hui Rex Wan‐Hin1ORCID,Leung Wai K.1,Yuen Man‐Fung13,Seto Wai‐Kay123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine School of Clinical Medicine, the University of Hong Kong Hong Kong

2. Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong‐Shenzhen Hospital Shenzhen China

3. State Key Laboratory of Liver Research The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong

4. Department of Clinical Oncology The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundOptimal glycaemic control has well‐established health benefits in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). It is uncertain whether optimal glycaemic control can benefit liver‐related outcomes.AimsTo examine the association of optimal glycaemic control with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver‐related mortality.MethodsIn a population‐based cohort, we identified patients with newly diagnosed DM between 2001 and 2016 in Hong Kong. Optimal glycaemic control was defined as mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% during the 3‐year lead‐in period after DM diagnosis. By applying propensity score matching to balance covariates, we analysed glycaemic control via competing risk models with outcomes of interest being HCC and liver‐related mortality.ResultsWe identified 146,430 patients (52.2% males, mean age 61.4 ± 11.8 years). During a median follow‐up duration of 7.0 years, 1099 (0.8%) and 978 (0.7%) patients developed HCC and liver‐related deaths. Optimal glycaemic control, when compared to suboptimal glycaemic control, was associated with reduced risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.79). The risk of HCC increased with incremental HbA1c increases beyond >7% (SHR 1.29–1.71). Significant associations with HCC were also found irrespective of age (SHR 0.54–0.80), sex (SHR 0.68–0.69), BMI <25 or ≥25 kg/m2 (SHR 0.63–0.75), smoking (SHR 0.61–0.72), hepatic steatosis (SHR 0.67–0.68) and aspirin/statin/metformin use (SHR 0.67–0.75). A lower risk of liver‐related mortality in relation to optimal glycaemic control was also observed (SHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61–0.80).ConclusionsGlycaemic control is an independent risk factor for HCC and liver‐related mortality, and should be incorporated into oncoprotective strategies in the general DM population.

Funder

State Key Laboratory of Liver Research

Publisher

Wiley

Reference28 articles.

1. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries;Sung H;CA Cancer J Clin,2021

2. Diabetes medications and risk of HCC;Plaz Torres MC;Hepatology,2022

3. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications;Zheng Y;Nat Rev Endocrinol,2018

4. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country‐level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045;Sun H;Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2022

5. 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes—2022;Committee ADAPP;Diabetes Care,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3