Do psychotic experiences act as effect modifiers in youths with common mental health problems allocated to transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy versus management as usual? Secondary analyses of the Mind‐My‐Mind randomized trial

Author:

Rimvall Martin Køster12ORCID,Vassard Ditte2,Christensen Robin34ORCID,Nielsen Sabrina Mai34,Pagsberg Anne Katrine25,Correll Christoph U.678,Jeppesen Pia125

Affiliation:

1. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Copenhagen University Hospital—Psychiatry Region Zealand Roskilde Denmark

2. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center Copenhagen University Hospital—Mental Health Services CPH Copenhagen Denmark

3. Section for Biostatistics and Evidence‐Based Research, The Parker Institute Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

4. Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

5. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Psychiatry Research The Zucker Hillside Hospital Glen Oaks New York USA

7. Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead New York USA

8. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPsychotic experiences (PEs) are common in help‐seeking youths with non‐psychotic mental health problems, yet the clinical importance of PEs as potential effect modifiers of psychotherapy interventions has been scarcely examined. We examined if PEs were associated with a differential response to transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) aimed at common emotional and behavioural problems.MethodsWe present secondary analyses from the Mind My Mind (MMM) trial that randomized 396, 6‐16‐year‐old youths to either 9–13 sessions of transdiagnostic modular community‐based CBT (MMM) or community‐based management as usual (MAU). MMM was superior to MAU in reducing parent‐reported impact of mental health problems according to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). PEs were assessed by semi‐structured screening interviews at baseline. The contrast between subgroups (presence/absence of PEs) was calculated to test if PEs are potential effect modifiers regarding the change in parent‐reported SDQ‐impact (primary outcome, rated 0[low]‐10[high]) and other SDQ‐related outcomes.ResultsBaseline PEs were present in 74 (19%) of youths. The superior effect of MMM on changes in SDQ‐impact from baseline to week 18 was not effect modified by the presence of PEs (PEs[yes] −0.89 [95%CI −1.77;‐0.01] vs. PEs[no] −1.10 [95%CI −1.52;‐0.68], p‐value for interaction .68). For secondary outcomes similar patterns were observed.Limitations Statistical power was limited to show if PEs modified treatment response. Replication and meta‐analytic evidence are needed.ConclusionsThe beneficial effects of MMM transdiagnostic CBT did not differ by PE‐status, indicating that youths with emotional and behavioural problems could be offered such psychotherapy irrespective of co‐occurring PEs.

Funder

Lundbeck Foundation

TrygFonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,Pshychiatric Mental Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3