Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech
-
Published:2015
Issue:1
Volume:43
Page:9-21
-
ISSN:1073-1105
-
Container-title:Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Law. Med. Ethics
Author:
Orentlicher David
Abstract
As states increasingly impose informed consent mandates on abortion providers, the required disclosures bring two well-established legal doctrines into conflict — the First Amendment’s freedom of speech and the physician’s duty to obtain informed consent.On one hand, the First Amendment provides for a broad freedom of speech, under which government may neither prevent people from voicing their own views, nor compel individuals to voice the government’s views. As the Supreme Court observed in Wooley v. Maynard, the First Amendment protects “both the right to speak freely and the right to refrain from speaking at all.” When legislatures tell physicians what they must disclose to their patients, the physicians lose their right not to speak.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference156 articles.
1. 56 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. 3205(a)(1).
2. 110 Id, at 81.
3. 81 Cod, S.D. Laws § 34–23A-10.1(1)(e) and (1)(e)(2).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Reproductive Technologies and Free Speech;Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics;2021
2. Notes;The Disappearing First Amendment;2019-10-03