Retrospective review of the effectiveness of orthokeratology versus soft peripheral defocus contact lenses for myopia management in an academic setting

Author:

Skidmore Kelsea V.1,Tomiyama Erin S.12,Rickert Martin E.3,Richdale Kathryn1,Kollbaum Pete3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Houston College of Optometry Houston Texas USA

2. Southern California College of Optometry Marshall B. Ketchum University Fullerton California USA

3. Indiana University School of Optometry Bloomington Indiana USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the relative efficacy of peripheral defocus contact lenses (PDCLs) and orthokeratology (OK) in a real‐world clinical population, and compare these results with previous randomised controlled clinical trials.MethodsRecords from a university practice were reviewed to identify children who were treated with OK or PDCLs. The analysed sample contained 273 visits from 77 patients. Annualised rates of axial length (AL) progression were calculated and used as the response variable in both linear mixed‐effects (LME) and nonlinear regression models.ResultsOn average, children were 10.7 years of age at baseline (p = 0.14 between treatments), and most patients were female. More Asian children wore OK lenses compared with PDCLs (p < 0.01). At baseline, children had ~3.00 D of myopia and 0.75 D of astigmatism in both treatment groups (p > 0.20 between treatments). LME regression models using only baseline covariates showed no evidence that the annualised change in AL differed between treatments, with or without the inclusion of age, race, sex, baseline AL or spherical equivalent refractive error. Across all possible subsets of models, age at baseline was the best predictor of annualised AL change. There was no statistical difference between parameters of an exponential decay model fitted within treatment using follow‐up age as a time‐varying predictor, indicating that the rate of annualised change in AL was similar for OK and PDCL.ConclusionsRetrospective analysis of real‐world clinical data found no difference in annualised AL growth between PDCL and OK. Importantly, the AL progression from this clinical setting is consistent with that reported in randomised clinical trials. Therefore, continued research of real‐world performance is warranted to understand the safety and efficacy of modern myopia control treatments in the broader population.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sensory Systems,Optometry,Ophthalmology

Reference35 articles.

1. The global initiative for the elimination of avoidable blindness;Pararajasegaram R;Community Eye Health,1998

2. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050

3. Prevalence of visual impairment in the United States;Vitale S;JAMA Ophthalmol,2006

4. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology

5. Long-term Pattern of Progression of Myopic Maculopathy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3