If you build it, they may not come: Understanding factors influencing use of a community resource referral technology

Author:

Fichtenberg Caroline12ORCID,Cartier Yuri1ORCID,Burnett Jessica3,Ricks‐Stephen Coiel3,Paulson Gregory3

Affiliation:

1. Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network (SIREN), Center for Health and Community University of California San Francisco California USA

2. Department of Family and Community Medicine University of California San Francisco California USA

3. Trenton Health Team Trenton New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveIdentify factors affecting the use of a community resource referral platform among local community‐based organizations (CBOs) and test strategies to increase platform use.Data Sources and Study SettingData sources included platform usage data and semi‐structured interviews. The study took place in a small city in the Northeastern United States from 2020 to 2022.Study DesignWe analyzed platform data and conducted interviews with local organizations and organizations in other communities to understand barriers to CBOs' use of the referral platform and identify strategies that might increase use. We then tested 4 strategies and assessed impacts via time trend analysis of platform usage and qualitative interviews.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsPlatform usage data were obtained from the platform. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with staff and leaders of 36 local CBOs and 9 external organizations.Principal FindingsFour years after launch, platform use remained relatively low. None of the tested strategies (data insight reports, a referral hub, tailored training, and a communication campaign) noticeably increased platform use. The main barrier to the use of the platform was the lack of perceived usefulness, mostly because existing processes for identifying resources and referring clients worked well enough and because many organizations were already required to use a client management or referral tool. Additional barriers included the lack of comfort with and, in some cases, active dislike of e‐referrals, and lack of comfort with technology tools overall. Organizations that were most likely to find the platform useful and to use it were those that provided referrals for a wide range of needs and whose staff were not already familiar with local resources.ConclusionsOrganizations seeking to implement referral platforms should not assume that local CBOs will automatically take up these platforms. For these platforms to succeed, much more attention needs to be paid to ensuring the platforms provide value to the CBOs they seek to engage.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3