Evaluation of a protocol for eliciting narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experiences of care

Author:

Martino Steven C.1ORCID,Reynolds Kerry A.1,Grob Rachel2,Palimaru Alina I.3,Zelazny Sarah1,Slaughter Mary E.1,Rybowski Lise4,Parker Andrew M.1,Toomey Sara L.56,Schuster Mark A.37,Schlesinger Mark8

Affiliation:

1. RAND Corporation Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA

3. RAND Corporation Santa Monica California USA

4. The Severyn Group Ashburn Virginia USA

5. Boston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

6. Division of General Pediatrics Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine Pasadena California USA

8. Department of Health Policy and Management Yale University School of Public Health New Haven Connecticut USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the measurement properties of a set of six items designed to elicit narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experience.Data SourcesData came from 163 participants recruited from a probability‐based online panel of U.S. adults. Participants were family members of a child who had an overnight hospital stay in the past 12 months.Study DesignCross‐sectional survey with follow‐up phone interviews.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsParticipants completed an online (n = 129) or phone (n = 34) survey about their child's hospitalization experience. The survey contained closed‐ended items from the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Child HCAHPS) survey, followed by the six narrative items. Approximately 2 weeks after completing the survey, 47 participants additionally completed a one‐hour, semi‐structured phone interview, the results of which served as a “gold standard” for evaluating the fidelity of narrative responses. Qualitative content analysis was used to code narrative and interview responses for domains of patient experience and actionability.Principal FindingsThe average narrative was 248 words (SD = 319). Seventy‐nine percent of narratives mentioned a topic included in the Child HCAHPS survey; 89% mentioned a topic not covered by that survey; and 75% included at least one detailed description of an actionable event. Overall, there was 66% correspondence between narrative and interview responses. Correspondence was higher on the phone than in the online condition (75% vs. 59%).ConclusionsNarratives elicited from rigorously designed multi‐item sets can provide detailed, substantive information about pediatric inpatient experiences that hospitals could use to improve child and family experiences during pediatric hospitalization. They add context to closed‐ended survey item responses and provide information about experiences of care important to children and families that are not included in quantitative surveys.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3