Affiliation:
1. Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
2. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
3. UnitedHealth Group Minnetonka Minnesota USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo understand the relative role of prices versus utilization in the variation in total spending per patient across medical groups.Data SourcesWe conducted a cross‐sectional analysis of medical claims for commercially insured adults from a large national insurer in 2018.Study DesignAfter assigning patients to a medical group based on primary care visits in 2018, we calculated total medical spending for each patient in that year. Total spending included care provided by clinicians within the medical group and care provided by other providers, including hospitals. It did not include drug spending. We estimated the case mix adjusted spending per patient for each medical group. Within each market, we categorized medical groups into quartiles based on the group's spending per patient. To decompose spending variation into price versus utilization, we compared spending differences between highest and lowest quartile medical groups under two scenarios: (1) using actual prices (2) using a standardized price (same price used for a given service across the nation).Principal FindingsIn total, 3,921,736 patients were assigned to 7284 medical groups. Per‐patient spending in the highest quartile of spending medical groups was $1813 higher than per‐patient spending in the lowest spending quartile of medical groups (50% higher relative spending). This overall difference was primarily driven by differences in inpatient care, imaging, and specialty care. In the scenario where we used standardized prices, the difference in spending between medical groups in the top and bottom quartiles decreased to $1425, implying that 79% of the $1813 difference in spending between the top and bottom quartile groups is explained by utilization and the remaining 21% by prices. The likely explanation for the modest impact of prices is that patients cared for by a given medical group receive care across a wide range of providers.ConclusionsPrices explained a modest fraction of the differences in spending between medical groups.
Reference23 articles.
1. MN Community Measurement. MNHealthScores. Published 2022.https://mncm.org/mnhealthscores/
2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.Medicare FFS Physician Feedback Program/Value‐Based Payment Modifier. Published 2021.https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/PhysicianFeedbackProgram
3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Alternative Quality Contract. Published 2017.https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/priorities‐in‐action/bcbsma‐alternative‐quality‐contract.html
4. Spending variation among ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program
5. Variation in spending associated with primary care practices
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献