Affiliation:
1. Department of Population Health NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA
2. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
3. Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHHSC/CORE) Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Center for Clinical Standards & Quality (CCSQ) Baltimore Maryland USA
5. Department of Applied Health Science Indiana University Bloomington School of Public Health Bloomington Indiana USA
6. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of integrating Medicare Advantage (MA) admissions into the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital outcome measures through combining Medicare Advantage Organization (MAO) encounter‐ and hospital‐submitted inpatient claims.Data Sources and Study SettingBeneficiary enrollment data and inpatient claims from the Integrated Data Repository for 2018 Medicare discharges.Study DesignWe examined timeliness of MA claims, compared diagnosis and procedure codes for admissions with claims submitted both by the hospital and the MAO (overlapping claims), and compared demographic characteristics and principal diagnosis codes for admissions with overlapping claims versus admissions with a single claim.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsWe combined hospital‐ and MAO‐submitted claims to capture MA admissions from all hospitals and identified overlapping claims. For admissions with only an MAO‐submitted claim, we used provider history data to match the National Provider Identifier on the claim to the CMS Certification Number used for reporting purposes in CMS outcome measures.Principal FindingsAfter removing void and duplicate claims, identifying overlapped claims between the hospital‐ and MAO‐submitted datasets, restricting claims to acute care and critical access hospitals, and bundling same admission claims, we identified 5,078,611 MA admissions. Of these, 76.1% were submitted by both the hospital and MAO, 14.2% were submitted only by MAOs, and 9.7% were submitted only by hospitals. Nearly all (96.6%) hospital‐submitted claims were submitted within 3 months after a one‐year performance period, versus 85.2% of MAO‐submitted claims. Among the 3,864,524 admissions with overlapping claims, 98.9% shared the same principal diagnosis code between the two datasets, and 97.5% shared the same first procedure code.ConclusionsInpatient MA data are feasible for use in CMS claims‐based hospital outcome measures. We recommend prioritizing hospital‐submitted over MAO‐submitted claims for analyses. Monitoring, data audits, and ongoing policies to improve the quality of MA data are important approaches to address potential missing data and errors.
Funder
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Reference25 articles.
1. OchiengN FreedM BiniekJF DamicoA NeumanT.Medicare Advantage in 2023: Enrollment Update and Key Trends. Accessed January 31 2024.https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/medicare-advantage-in-2023-enrollment-update-and-key-trends/
2. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.March 2022 report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy: The Medicare Advantage program: Status Report and mandated report on dual‐eligible special needs plans. Accessed January 31 2024.https://www.medpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Mar22_MedPAC_ReportToCongress_Ch12_SEC.pdf
3. OchiengN BiniekJF.Beneficiary experience affordability utilization and quality in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare: a review of the literature. KFF. Accessed January 31 2024.https://www.kff.org/medicare/report/beneficiary‐experience‐affordability‐utilization‐and‐quality‐in‐medicare‐advantage‐and‐traditional‐medicare‐a‐review‐of‐the‐literature/
4. Effect of Medicare Advantage on Hospital Readmission and Mortality Rankings
5. Comparing Medicare Advantage And Traditional Medicare: A Systematic Review