Affiliation:
1. HSR&D Center of Innovation Center for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock Arkansas USA
2. School of Social Work Saint Louis University St. Louis Missouri USA
3. VA Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (Behavioral Health QUERI) Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock Arkansas USA
4. VA Evidence‐based Policy Implementation Center Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (EPIC QUERI) Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System North Little Rock Arkansas USA
5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock Arkansas USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo describe a process model for assisting partners in addressing requirements of legislation and review policy analysis, planning, and evaluation design processes and tools. Throughout its 25‐year history, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program has been a forerunner in partnering with organizational leaders to improve health care. The Foundations of Evidence‐based Policymaking Act of 2018 provided new opportunities for QUERI and other implementation scientists to support federal agency leaders in implementing, evaluating, and reporting on congressionally mandated programs. Although implementation scientists have the skills to support partnered implementation and evaluation, these skills must be adapted for congressionally mandated projects as many scientists have limited experience in policy analysis and the intersection of data informing organizational policy, programs, and practices (i.e., evidence‐based policy).Data Sources and Study SettingDuring the conduct of four congressionally mandated projects, our national VA QUERI team developed processes and tools to achieve the goals and aims of our VHA partners and to ensure our collective work and reporting met legislative requirements.Study DesignOur process model, program planning, and analysis tools were informed by an iterative process of refining and adapting the tools over a period of six years, spanning the years 2017 to 2023.Principal FindingsWork to support our partners was conducted across three phases: preparation and planning, conducting implementation and evaluation, and developing the congressionally mandated report. The processes and tools we developed within the context of mutually respectful and honest partnerships have been critical to our QUERI center's success in this area.ConclusionsLessons we learned may help other scientists partnering in VA or other federal agencies to plan, conduct, and report on congressionally mandated projects.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献