Evaluating a health system‐wide opioid disposal intervention distributing home‐disposal bags

Author:

Huang Lyen C.12ORCID,Bleicher Josh1,Torre Michael3,Johnson Jordan E.1,Presson Angela3,Millar Morgan M.3,Gordon Adam J.45,Brooke Benjamin S.1,Kaphingst Kimberly A.26,Harris Alex H. S.78

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

2. Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

3. Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

4. Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA

5. Informatics, Decision‐Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Salt Lake City Utah USA

6. Department of Communication University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

7. Department of Surgery Stanford University Stanford California USA

8. VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation Palo Alto VA Health Care System Palo Alto California USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate a health system‐wide intervention distributing free home‐disposal bags to surgery patients prescribed opioids.Data Sources and Study SettingWe collected patient surveys and electronic medical record data at an academic health system.Study DesignWe conducted a prospective observational study. The bags were primarily distributed at pharmacies, though pharmacists delivered bags to some patients. The primary outcome was disposal of leftover opioids (effectiveness). Secondary outcomes were patient willingness to dispose and factors associated with disposal (effectiveness), recalling receipt of the bag (reach), and recalling receipt of bags and disposal over time (maintenance). We used a modified Poisson regression to evaluate the relative risk of disposal. Inverse probability of treatment weighting, based on propensity scores, was used to account for differences between survey responders and non‐responders and reduce nonresponse bias.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsFrom August 2020 to May 2021, we surveyed patients 2 weeks after discharge (allowing for home opioid use). Eligibility criteria were age ≥18, English being primary language, valid email address, hospitalization ≤30 days, discharge home, and an opioid prescription sent to a system pharmacy.Principal FindingsWe identified 5134 patients with 2174 completing the survey (response rate 42.3%). Among respondents, 1375 (63.8%) recalled receiving the disposal bag. Among 1075 respondents with leftover opioids, 284 (26.4%) disposed, 552 (51.3%) planned to dispose, 79 (7.4%) did not plan to dispose, 69 (6.4%) had undecided, and 91 (8.5%) had not considered disposal. Recalling receipt of the bag (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–1.37) was positively associated with disposal. Patients who used opioids in the last year were less likely to dispose (IRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93). Disposal rates remained stable over the study period while recalling receipt of bags trended up.ConclusionsA pragmatic implementation of a disposal intervention resulted in lower disposal rates than prior trials.

Funder

Health Services Research and Development

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Reference64 articles.

1. Ambulatory surgery data from hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: United States, 2010;Hall MJ;Natl Health Stat Rep,2017

2. Postsurgical prescriptions for opioid naive patients and association with overdose and misuse: retrospective cohort study

3. Opioids Prescribed After Low-Risk Surgical Procedures in the United States, 2004-2012

4. Overview of operating room procedures during inpatient stays in U.S. hospitals, 2018;McDermott KW;Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]

5. Statewide Implementation of Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Guidelines

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3