Specialist use among privately insured children with disabilities

Author:

Chien Alyna T.12ORCID,Wisk Lauren E.3,Beaulieu Nancy4ORCID,Houtrow Amy J.5,Van Cleave Jeanne6,Fu Christina4,Cutler David7,Landrum Mary Beth4

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of General Pediatrics Boston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Pediatrics Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA

4. Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

6. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anshutz Medical Campus, Children's Hospital Colorado Aurora Colorado USA

7. Department of Economics Harvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate primary care practice ownership and specialist‐use patterns for commercially insured children with disabilities.Data Sources and Study SettingA national commercial claims database and the Health Systems and Provider Database from 2012 to 2016 are the data sources for this study.Study DesignThis cross‐sectional, descriptive study examines: (1) the most visited type of pediatric primary care physician and practice (independent or system‐owned); (2) pediatric and non‐pediatric specialist‐use patterns; and (3) how practice ownership relates to specialist‐use patterns.Data Collection/Extraction MethodsThis study identifies 133,749 person‐years of commercially insured children with disabilities aged 0–18 years with at least 24 months of continuous insurance coverage by linking a national commercial claims data set with the Health Systems and Provider Database and applying the validated Children with Disabilities Algorithm.Principal FindingsThree‐quarters (75.9%) of children with disabilities received their pediatric primary care in independent practices. Nearly two thirds (59.6%) used at least one specialist with 45.1% using nonpediatric specialists, 28.8% using pediatric ones, and 17.0% using both. Specialist‐use patterns varied by both child age and specialist type. Children with disabilities in independent practices were as likely to see a specialist as those in system‐owned ones: 57.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 56.7%–57.4%) versus 57.3% (95% CI 56.6%–58.0%), respectively (p = 0.635). The percent using two or more types of specialists was 46.1% (95% CI 45.4%–46.7%) in independent practices, comparable to that in systems 47.1% (95% CI 46.2%–48.0%) (p = 0.054). However, the mean number of specialist visits was significantly lower in independent practices than in systems—4.0 (95% CI 3.9%–4.0%) versus 4.4 (95% CI 4.3%–4.6%) respectively—reaching statistical significance with p < 0.0001.ConclusionsRecognizing how privately insured children with disabilities use pediatric primary care from pediatric and nonpediatric primary care specialists through both independent and system‐owned practices is important for improving care quality and value.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3