Changes in cross‐sector collaboration between nurse home visitors and community providers in the United States: A panel survey analysis

Author:

Williams Venice Ng1ORCID,Franco‐Rowe Carol1,Knudtson Michael1,Tung Gregory2,Allison Mandy1

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, ACCORDS (Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science) Aurora Colorado USA

2. Department of Health Systems, Management & Policy Colorado School of Public Health Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveAssess changes in cross‐sector collaboration between Nurse‐Family Partnership (NFP) nurse home visitors and community providers in the United States.Data Sources and Study SettingWe collected primary data via internet‐based surveys of all NFP nursing supervisors in the United States in 2018, 2020, and 2021.Study DesignWe conducted a panel survey to measure changes in cross‐sector collaboration between NFP nurses and 10 provider types in healthcare and social services. We assessed relational coordination using the validated seven item Relational Coordination Scale and structural integration using four items adapted from the Interagency Collaboration Activities Scale. Responses over time were compared using one‐way analysis of variances (ANOVAs) and pairwise t‐tests. We used the Kruskal–Wallis rank test to assess differences in collaboration by implementing agency type.Data CollectionAll nursing supervisors from NFP implementing agencies in the United States were eligible for the study. Survey implementation was conducted using Qualtrics and administered to all eligible participants (N = 370 [2018], 383 [2020], 414 [2021]). Email reminders were sent every 7–10 days, followed by a final telephone outreach.Principal FindingsThe response rate was 71% in 2018, 83% in 2020, and 74% in 2021. Relational coordination scores were calculated as a mean of the seven items and ranged from 1 to 5 (not at all to completely); integration scores were calculated as a sum of the four items and ranged from 4 to 20, where higher scores indicated greater sharing of resources. Coordination with women's care increased from 2018 to 2020 (M = 3.39 vs. 3.57; p < 0.01); while coordination (M = 3.23 vs. 3.01; p < 0.05) and integration (M = 6.50 vs. 5.28 vs. 5.43; p < 0.01) with parenting programs decreased.ConclusionsChanges to cross‐sector collaboration varied by provider type, likely due to the delivery of NFP and other services via telehealth during the COVID‐19 pandemic. There is an opportunity to improve cross‐sector collaboration in home visiting to better address family needs.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Reference40 articles.

1. American Public Health Association.Cross‐sector collaboration: making partnerships work for your community. Accessed March 23 2023.https://www.apha.org/events-and-meetings/apha-calendar/webinar-events/2020/cross-sector-collaboration

2. Long-term Effects of Prenatal and Infancy Nurse Home Visitation on the Life Course of Youths

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3