Identifying low acuity Emergency Department visits with a machine learning approach: The low acuity visit algorithms (LAVA)

Author:

Chen Angela T.123ORCID,Kuzma Richard S.4,Friedman Ari B.134ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Health Care Management Department, The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Emergency Medicine Department University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo improve the performance of International Classification of Disease (ICD) code rule‐based algorithms for identifying low acuity Emergency Department (ED) visits by using machine learning methods and additional covariates.Data SourcesWe used secondary data on ED visits from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Survey (NHAMCS), from 2016 to 2020.Study DesignWe established baseline performance metrics with seven published algorithms consisting of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision codes used to identify low acuity ED visits. We then trained logistic regression, random forest, and gradient boosting (XGBoost) models to predict low acuity ED visits. Each model was trained on five different covariate sets of demographic and clinical data. Model performance was compared using a separate validation dataset. The primary performance metric was the probability that a visit identified by an algorithm as low acuity did not experience significant testing, treatment, or disposition (positive predictive value, PPV). Subgroup analyses assessed model performance across age, sex, and race/ethnicity.Data CollectionWe used 2016–2019 NHAMCS data as the training set and 2020 NHAMCS data for validation.Principal FindingsThe training and validation data consisted of 53,074 and 9542 observations, respectively. Among seven rule‐based algorithms, the highest‐performing had a PPV of 0.35 (95% CI [0.33, 0.36]). All model‐based algorithms outperformed existing algorithms, with the least effective—random forest using only age and sex—improving PPV by 26% (up to 0.44; 95% CI [0.40, 0.48]). Logistic regression and XGBoost trained on all variables improved PPV by 83% (to 0.64; 95% CI [0.62, 0.66]). Multivariable models also demonstrated higher PPV across all three demographic subgroups.ConclusionsMachine learning models substantially outperform existing algorithms based on ICD codes in predicting low acuity ED visits. Variations in model performance across demographic groups highlight the need for further research to ensure their applicability and fairness across diverse populations.

Funder

Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3