Assessing the difference in racial and ethnic disparities in access to and use of care between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage

Author:

Gangopadhyaya Anuj1ORCID,Zuckerman Stephen1,Rao Nikhil1

Affiliation:

1. Health Policy Center Urban Institute Health Policy Center 500 L'Enfant Plaza SW Washington DC 20024 USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTest whether racial‐ethnic disparities in the access and use of care differ between Traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA).Data SourceSecondary data from the 2015–2018 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS).Study DesignMeasure Black‐White and Hispanic‐White disparities in access to care and use of preventive services within TM, within MA, and assess the difference‐in‐disparities between the two programs with and without controls for factors that could influence enrollment, access, and use.Data Collection/ExtractionPool 2015–2018 MCBS data and restrict to non‐Hispanic Black, non‐Hispanic White, or Hispanic respondents.Principal FindingsBlack enrollees have worse access to care relative to White enrollees in TM and MA, particularly for cost‐related measures such as not having problems paying medical bills (11–13 pp. lower for Black enrollees; p < 0.05) and satisfaction with out‐of‐pocket costs (5–6 pp. lower; p < 0.05). We find no difference in Black‐White disparities between TM and MA. Hispanic enrollees have worse access to care relative to White enrollees in TM but similar access relative to White enrollees in MA. Hispanic‐White disparities in not delaying care due to cost and not reporting problems paying medical bills are narrower in MA relative to TM by about 4 pp (significant at the p < 0.05 level) each. We find no consistent evidence that Black‐White or Hispanic‐White differences in the use of preventive services differ between TM and MA.ConclusionsAcross the measures of access and use studied here, racial and ethnic disparities in MA are not substantially narrower than in TM for Black and Hispanic enrollees relative to White enrollees. For Black enrollees, this study suggests that system‐wide reforms are required to reduce existing disparities. For Hispanic enrollees, MA does narrow some disparities in access to care relative to White enrollees but, in part, because White enrollees do not do as well in MA as they do in TM.

Funder

Arnold Ventures

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Reference25 articles.

1. FreedM BiniekJ DamicoA NeumanT.Medicare advantage in 2021: Enrollment Update and Key Trends.2021. Accessed June 7 2022https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/medicare-advantage-in-2021-enrollment-update-and-key-trends/

2. Growth In Medicare Advantage Greatest Among Black And Hispanic Enrollees

3. Kaiser Family Foundation.Profile of Medicare Beneficiaries by Race and Ethnicity: A Chartpack.2016. Accessed October 30 2022. https://files.kff.org/attachment/chartpack-profile-of-medicare-beneficiaries-by-race-and-ethnicity-a-chartpack

4. FreedM BiniekJ DamicoA NeumanT.Medicare Advantage in 2021: Premiums Cost Sharing Out‐of‐Pocket Limits and Supplemental Benefits.2021. Accessed June 7 2022https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/medicare-advantage-in-2021-premiums-cost-sharing-out-of-pocket-limits-and-supplemental-benefits/

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3