A mixed‐methods assessment of off‐duty police shootings in a media‐curated database

Author:

Asabor Emmanuella Ngozi12ORCID,Lett Elle34ORCID,Mosely Brein567ORCID,Boone Cheriko A.8ORCID,Sundaresan Saahil3ORCID,Wong Tian An9ORCID,Majumder Maimuna S.310ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Yale School of Medicine Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA

2. Department of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA

3. Computational Health Informatics Program (CHIP) Boston Children's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Statistics University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USA

6. Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

7. Harvard Graduate School of Education Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences The George Washington University Washington DC USA

9. Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Michigan‐Dearborn Dearborn Michigan USA

10. Department of Pediatrics Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine rates of killings perpetrated by off‐duty police and news coverage of those killings, by victim race and gender, and to qualitatively evaluate the contexts in which those killings occur.Data Sources and Study SettingWe used the Mapping Police Violence database to curate a dataset of killings perpetrated by off‐duty police (2013–2021, N = 242). We obtained data from Media Cloud to assess news coverage of each off‐duty police‐perpetrated killing.Study DesignOur study used a convergent mixed‐methods design. We examined off‐duty police‐perpetrated killings by victim race and gender, comparing absolute rates and rates relative to total police‐perpetrated killings. [Correction added on 26 June 2023, after first online publication: ‘policy‐perpetrated’ has been changed to ‘police‐perpetrated’ in the preceding sentence.] We also conducted race‐gender comparisons of the frequency of news media reporting of these killings, and whether reporting identified the perpetrator as an off‐duty officer. We conducted thematic analysis of the narrative free‐text field that accompanied quantitative data using grounded theory.Principal FindingsBlack men were the most frequent victims killed by off‐duty police (39.3%) followed by white men (25.2%), Hispanic men (11.2%), white women (9.1%), men of unknown race (9.1%), and Black women (4.1%). Black women had the highest rate of off‐duty/total police‐perpetrated killings relative to white men (rate = 12.82%, RR = 8.32, 95% CI: 4.43–15.63). There were threefold higher odds of news reporting of a police‐perpetrated killing and the off‐duty status of the officer for incidents with Black and Hispanic victims. Qualitative analysis revealed that off‐duty officers intervened violently within their own social networks; their presence escalated situations; they intentionally obscured information about their lethal violence; they intervened while impaired; their victims were often in crisis; and their intervention posed harm and potential secondary traumatization to witnesses.ConclusionsPolice perpetrate lethal violence while off duty, compromising public health and safety. Additionally, off‐duty police‐perpetrated killings are reported differentially by the news media depending on the race of the victim.

Funder

National Institute of General Medical Sciences

National Science Foundation

NIH Office of the Director

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy

Reference53 articles.

1. The Relationship Between Structural Racism and Black-White Disparities in Fatal Police Shootings at the State Level

2. Always Prepared: Police Off-Duty Guns

3. Rep. Cunningham R (Duke) [R C 50. H.R.218‐108th Congress (2003–2004)]: Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004.2004. Accessed March 9 2023http://www.congress.gov/

4. Off-Duty and Under Arrest

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3