Racial inequities in cesarean use among high‐ and low‐risk deliveries: An analysis of childbirth hospitalizations in New Jersey from 2000 to 2015

Author:

McGregor Alecia J.1ORCID,Garman David2,Hung Peiyin3ORCID,Tosin‐Oni Motunrayo4,Orona Kaitlyn Camacho4,Molina Rose L.5,Ciraldo Katrina J.6,Kozhimannil Katy Backes7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy and Management Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Economics Tufts University Medford Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Health Services Policy and Management University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health Columbia South Carolina USA

4. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

5. Division of Global and Community Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

6. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

7. Division of Health Policy and Management University of Minnesota School of Public Health Minneapolis Minnesota USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo examine racial inequities in low‐risk and high‐risk (or “medically appropriate”) cesarean delivery rates in New Jersey during the era surrounding the United States cesarean surge and peak.Study Setting and DesignThis retrospective repeated cross‐sectional study examined the universe of childbirth hospitalizations in New Jersey from January 1, 2000 through September 30, 2015. We estimate the likelihood of cesarean delivery by maternal race and ethnicity, with mixed‐level logistic regression models, stratified by cesarean risk level designated by the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM).Data Sources and Analytic SampleWe used all‐payer hospital discharge data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Discharge Database and linked this data to the American Hospital Association Annual Survey. ZIP‐code Tabulation Area (ZCTA)‐level racialized economic segregation index data were from the 2007–2011 American Community Survey. We identified 1,604,976 statewide childbirth hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases‐9‐CM (ICD‐9) diagnosis and procedure codes and Diagnosis‐Related Group codes, and created an indicator of cesarean delivery using ICD‐9 codes.Principal FindingsAmong low‐risk deliveries, Black patients, particularly those in the age group of 35–39 years, had higher predicted probabilities of giving birth via cesarean than White people in the same age categories (Black‐adjusted predicted probability = 24.0%; vs. White‐adjusted predicted probability = 17.3%). Among high‐risk deliveries, Black patients aged 35 to 39 years had a lower predicted probability (by 2.7 percentage points) of giving birth via cesarean compared with their White counterparts.ConclusionsThis study uncovered a lack of medically appropriate cesarean delivery for Black patients, with low‐risk Black patients at higher odds of cesarean delivery and high‐risk Black patients at lower odds of cesarean than their White counterparts. The significant Black‐White inequities highlight the need to address misalignment of evidence‐based cesarean delivery practice in the efforts to improve maternal health equity. Quality metrics that track whether cesareans are provided when medically needed may contribute to clinical and policy efforts to prevent disproportionate maternal morbidity and mortality among Black patients.

Funder

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Publisher

Wiley

Reference52 articles.

1. Cesarean Delivery Rates Vary Tenfold Among US Hospitals; Reducing Variation May Address Quality And Cost Issues

2. OstermanMJK. "Changes in Primary and Repeat Cesarean Delivery: United States 2016–202." National Vital Statistics Rapid Release. Report No. 21 July 2022. Accessed August 24 2024.https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr021.pdf

3. World Health Organization.WHO statement on caesarean section rates. World Health Organization: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research.2015Accessed September 12 2022.https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-RHR-15.02

4. Concerning trends in maternal risk factors in the United States: 1989–2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3