Comparison of survival outcomes among older adults with major trauma after trauma center versus non‐trauma center care in the United States

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare level 1 and 2 trauma centers with similarly sized non‐trauma centers on survival after major trauma among older adults.Data Sources and Study SettingWe used claims of 100% of 2012–2017 Medicare fee‐for‐service beneficiaries who received hospital care after major trauma.Study DesignSurvival differences were estimated after applying propensity‐score‐based overlap weights. Subgroup analyses were performed for ambulance‐transported patients and by external cause. We assessed the roles of prehospital care, hospital quality, and volume.Data CollectionData were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.Principal FindingsThirty‐day mortality was higher overall at level 1 versus non‐trauma centers by 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8, 2.6) percentage points (pp). Thirty‐day mortality was higher at level 1 versus non‐trauma centers by 2.3 (95% CI: 1.9, 2.8) pp for falls and 2.3 (95% CI: 0.2, 4.4) pp for motor vehicle crashes. Differences persisted at 1 year. Level 1 and 2 trauma centers had similar outcomes. Hospital quality and volume did not explain these differences. In the ambulance‐transported subgroup, after adjusting for prehospital variables, no statistically significant differences remained.ConclusionsTrauma centers may not provide longer survival than similarly sized non‐trauma hospitals for severely injured older adults.