Quality improvement lessons learned from National Implementation of the “Patient Safety Events in Community Care: Reporting, Investigation, and Improvement Guidebook”

Author:

Sullivan Jennifer L.12ORCID,Shin Marlena H.3ORCID,Chan Jeffrey3,Shwartz Michael3ORCID,Miech Edward J.4ORCID,Borzecki Ann M.567,Yackel Edward8ORCID,Yende Sachin9ORCID,Rosen Amy K.310ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports (LTSS COIN) VA Providence Healthcare System, Capt. Jonathan H. Harwood Jr. Center for Research Providence Rhode Island USA

2. School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA

3. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Veterans Affairs Center for Health Information & Communication Roudebush VA Medical Center Indianapolis Indiana USA

5. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research VA Bedford Healthcare System Bedford Massachusetts USA

6. Department of Health Law, Policy and Management Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Section of General Internal Medicine Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

8. VA National Center for Patient Safety Ann Arbor Michigan USA

9. Veterans Health Administration Office of Integrated Veteran Care Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

10. Department of Surgery Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate nationwide implementation of a Guidebook designed to standardize safety practices across VA‐delivered and VA‐purchased care (i.e., Community Care) and identify lessons learned and strategies to improve them.Data Sources and Study SettingQualitative data collected from key informants at 18 geographically diverse VA facilities across 17 Veterans Integrated Services Networks (VISNs).Study DesignWe conducted semi‐structured interviews from 2019 to 2022 with VISN Patient Safety Officers (PSOs) and VA facility patient safety and quality managers (PSMs and QMs) and VA Facility Community Care (CC) staff to assess lessons learned by examining organizational contextual factors affecting Guidebook implementation based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).Data Collection/Extraction MethodsInterviews were conducted virtually with 45 facility staff and 10 VISN PSOs. Using directed content analysis, we identified CFIR factors affecting implementation. These factors were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategy compilation to identify lessons learned that could be useful to our operational partners in improving implementation processes. We met frequently with our partners to discuss findings and plan next steps.Principal FindingsSix CFIR constructs were identified as both facilitators and barriers to Guidebook implementation: (1) planning for implementation; (2) engaging key knowledge holders; (3) available resources; (4) networks and communications; (5) culture; and (6) external policies. The two CFIR constructs that were only barriers included: (1) cosmopolitanism and (2) executing implementation.ConclusionsOur findings suggest several important lessons: (1) engage all collaborators involved in implementation; (2) ensure end‐users have opportunities to provide feedback; (3) describe collaborators' purpose and roles/responsibilities clearly at the start; (4) communicate information widely and repeatedly; and (5) identify how multiple high priorities can be synergistic. This evaluation will help our partners and key VA leadership to determine next steps and future strategies for improving Guidebook implementation through collaboration with VA staff.

Funder

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative

Publisher

Wiley

Reference61 articles.

1. United States Congress House of Representatives 113th Congress 2nd Session. H.R.3230. Veterans Access Choice and Accountability Act of 2014. [Became Public Law No: 113-146

2. 7 August 2014]. 113th Cong. 2nd sess. Congressional Bills GPO Access [online] {accessed 2014 Nov 24}.

3. House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.The VA Mission Act of 2018 (VA Maintaining Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act) Public Law No 115‐182.2018.

4. Understanding Veteran Wait Times

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3