Treating individuals with suicidal ideation in primary care: Patient‐level characteristics associated with follow‐up in the Collaborative Care Model

Author:

Candon Molly123,Wolk Courtney Benjamin13,Kattan Khazanov Gabriela134,Oslin David W.14,Pieri Matteo F.1,Press Matthew J.35,Anderson Eleanor1,Jager‐Hyman Shari13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is an evidence‐based approach which embeds behavioral health providers (BHPs) into primary care. Whether patients with suicidal ideation (SI) are willing to engage in CoCM is unclear.MethodsUsing Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) administrative data from primary care practices within an urban academic health system, we identified patients with and without SI who were referred to a CoCM BHP. We compared engagement, defined as attendance at ≥1 CoCM visit, across groups.ResultsBetween 2018 and 2022, 7391 primary care patients were referred to a CoCM BHP. Eight hundred and ninety‐two of these patients reported SI on the PHQ‐9 (754 on “several days” during the previous 2 weeks and 138 on “more than half or most days”). Across groups, most patients engaged in CoCM. Patients reporting SI on several days engaged at a lower rate (61.4%) than those reporting SI on more than half or most days (65.9%). Both SI groups engaged at a lower rate than the 6499 patients who did not report SI (67.5%).ConclusionMost patients referred to a CoCM BHP engaged in ≥1 visit. Rates were lower for patients with SI, with the lowest rate among those reporting SI on several days.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3