How do explicit, implicit, and sociodemographic measures relate to concurrent suicidal ideation? A comparative machine learning approach

Author:

Freichel René12ORCID,Kahveci Sercan34ORCID,O’Shea Brian25ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Department of Psychology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Psychology Paris‐Lodron‐University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria

4. Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Paris‐Lodron‐University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria

5. School of Psychology University of Nottingham Nottingham England

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionSuicide is a leading cause of death, and decades of research have identified a range of risk factors, including demographics, past self‐injury and suicide attempts, and explicit suicide cognitions. More recently, implicit self‐harm and suicide cognitions have been proposed as risk factors for the prospective prediction of suicidal behavior. However, most studies have examined these implicit and explicit risk factors in isolation, and little is known about their combined effects and interactions in the prediction of concurrent suicidal ideation.MethodsIn an online community sample of 6855 participants, we used different machine learning techniques to evaluate the utility of measuring implicit self‐harm and suicide cognitions to predict concurrent desire to self‐harm or die.ResultsDesire to self‐harm was best predicted using gradient boosting, achieving 83% accuracy. However, the most important predictors were mood, explicit associations, and past suicidal thoughts and behaviors; implicit measures provided little to no gain in predictive accuracy.ConclusionConsidering our focus on the concurrent prediction of explicit suicidal ideation, we discuss the need for future studies to assess the utility of implicit suicide cognitions in the prospective prediction of suicidal behavior using machine learning approaches.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3