Using a Madurella mycetomatis‐specific PCR on grains obtained via non‐invasive fine‐needle aspirated material is more accurate than cytology

Author:

Siddig Emmanuel Edwar123ORCID,Ahmed Ayman45ORCID,Hassan Omnia Babekir1,Bakhiet Sahar Mubarak16,Verbon Annelies2ORCID,Fahal Ahmed Hassan1ORCID,van de Sande Wendy W. J.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Mycetoma Research Center University of Khartoum Khartoum Sudan

2. Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands

3. Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences University of Khartoum Khartoum Sudan

4. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH) Allschwil Switzerland

5. Faculty of Science University of Basel Basel Switzerland

6. Institute of Endemic Disease, University of Khartoum Khartoum Sudan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEumycetoma is a chronic subcutaneous inflammatory fungal infection most often caused by the fungus Madurella mycetomatis. Using a species‐specific PCR on DNA directly isolated from grains is currently the most reliable method for species identification. However, so far, PCR has been performed on grains obtained through deep‐seated surgical biopsies, which are invasive procedures. Grains can also be obtained via ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (US‐FNA). Here we determined the diagnostic performance of species‐specific PCRs performed on samples obtained through US‐FNA.MethodsFrom 63 patients, US‐FNA was performed to obtain eumycetoma grains; 34 patients also underwent a deep‐seated biopsy. From the grains, DNA was isolated, and one pan‐fungal and two M. mycetomatis‐specific PCRs were performed. The sensitivity and specificity were determined.ResultsOf the 63 patients who underwent US‐FNA, 78% (49/63) had evidence of eumycetoma based on cytology and 93.7% (59/63) based on species‐specific PCRs. In the 34 patients for whom surgical biopsies were performed as well, 31 patients had a positive PCR for M. mycetomatis when DNA was isolated from the deep‐seated biopsy, and 30 had a positive PCR when DNA was obtained from the US‐FNA material. This resulted in a 96.8% sensitivity, and 100% specificity with 97.1% diagnostic accuracy for PCR performed on US‐FNA.ConclusionPCR performed on the US‐FNA material has a similar sensitivity and specificity as PCR performed on deep‐seated biopsies. Therefore, when using PCR, a deep‐seated biopsy may not be necessary to obtain grains.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Dermatology,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3