Epidemiology of infectious diseases in migrant populations from endemic or high‐endemic countries: A multicentric primary care‐based study in Spain

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of seven infections (Chagas disease, strongyloidiasis, schistosomiasis, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and C virus, and active tuberculosis) in migrant populations attended at primary care facilities in Catalonia, Spain.MethodsThis is a cross sectional study conducted from March to December 2018 at eight primary care centres in Catalonia, Spain where health professionals were recommended to systematically screen multiple infections in migrants considering the endemicity of the pathogens in their country of birth. Routine health data were retrospectively extracted from electronic health records of the primary care centres. The proportion of cases among individuals tested for each infection was estimated with its 95% confident interval (CI). Mixed‐effects logistics regression models were conducted to assess any possible association between the exposure variables and the primary outcome.ResultsOut of the 15,780 migrants that attended primary care centres, 2410 individuals were tested for at least one infection. Of the 508 (21.1%) migrants diagnosed with at least one condition, a higher proportion originated from Sub‐Saharan Africa (207, 40.7%), followed by South‐East Europe (117, 23.0%) and Latin‐America (88, 17.3%; p value <0.001). The proportion of migrants diagnosed with Chagas disease was 5/122 (4.1%, 95%CI 0.5–7.7), for strongyloidiasis 56/409 (13.7%, 95%CI 10.3–17.0) and for schistosomiasis 2/101 (2.0%, 95%CI 0.0–4.7) with very few cases tested. The estimated proportion for human immunodeficiency virus was 67/1176 (5.7%, 95%CI 4.4–7.0); 377/1478 (25.5%, 95%CI 23.3–27.7) for hepatitis B virus, with 108/1478 (7.3%, 95%CI 6.0–8.6) of them presenting an active infection, while 31/1433 (2.2%, 95%CI 1.4–2.9) were diagnosed with hepatitis C virus. One case of active tuberculosis was diagnosed after testing 172 migrant patients (0.6%, 95%CI 0.0–1.7).ConclusionsWe estimated a high proportion of the studied infections in migrants from endemic areas. Country‐specific estimations of the burden of infections in migrants are fundamental for the implementation of preventive interventions.