Solving the unsolved genetic epilepsies: Current and future perspectives

Author:

Johannesen Katrine M.12ORCID,Tümer Zeynep13,Weckhuysen Sarah4567,Barakat Tahsin Stefan8910ORCID,Bayat Allan21112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Genetics Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Epilepsy Genetics and Personalized Medicine The Danish Epilepsy Center Dianalund Denmark

3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. Applied and Translational Neurogenomics Group VIB Centre for Molecular Neurology Antwerp Belgium

5. Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

6. Department of Neurology University Hospital Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

7. μNEURO Research Centre of Excellence University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

8. Department of Clinical Genetics Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

9. Discovery Unit, Department of Clinical Genetics Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

10. ENCORE Expertise Center for Neurodevelopmental Disorders Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

11. Department of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark

12. Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractMany patients with epilepsy undergo exome or genome sequencing as part of a diagnostic workup; however, many remain genetically unsolved. There are various factors that account for negative results in exome/genome sequencing for patients with epilepsy: (1) the underlying cause is not genetic; (2) there is a complex polygenic explanation; (3) the illness is monogenic but the causative gene remains to be linked to a human disorder; (4) family segregation with reduced penetrance; (5) somatic mosaicism or the complexity of, for example, a structural rearrangement; or (6) limited knowledge or diagnostic tools that hinder the proper classification of a variant, resulting in its designation as a variant of unknown significance. The objective of this review is to outline some of the diagnostic options that lie beyond the exome/genome, and that might become clinically relevant within the foreseeable future. These options include: (1) re‐analysis of older exome/genome data as knowledge increases or symptoms change; (2) looking for somatic mosaicism or long‐read sequencing to detect low‐complexity repeat variants or specific structural variants missed by traditional exome/genome sequencing; (3) exploration of the non‐coding genome including disruption of topologically associated domains, long range non‐coding RNA, or other regulatory elements; and finally (4) transcriptomics, DNA methylation signatures, and metabolomics as complementary diagnostic methods that may be used in the assessment of variants of unknown significance. Some of these tools are currently not integrated into standard diagnostic workup. However, it is reasonable to expect that they will become increasingly available and improve current diagnostic capabilities, thereby enabling precision diagnosis in patients who are currently undiagnosed.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Novo Nordisk Fonden

Fondation Médicale Reine Elisabeth

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3