Lesion characteristics using high‐frequency low‐tidal volume ventilation versus standard ventilation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Author:

Qian Xiaoxiao1ORCID,Zei Paul C.1ORCID,Osorio Jose2,Hincapie Daniela1ORCID,Gabr Mohamed1,Peralta Adelqui3,Miranda‐Arboleda Andres F.1,Koplan Bruce A.1ORCID,Hoyos Carolina1,Matos Carlos D.3ORCID,Lopez‐Cabanillas Nestor4,Steiger Nathaniel A.1,Velasco Alejandro5,Alviz Isabella1ORCID,Kapur Sunil1ORCID,Tadros Thomas M.1,Tedrow Usha B.1,Sauer William H.1ORCID,Romero Jorge E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, HCA Miami Florida USA

3. VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Electrophysiology Section, Adventist Cardiovascular Institute Buenos Aires Argentina

5. Cardiac Electrophysiology Section University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionHigh‐frequency low‐tidal‐volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long‐term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high‐power short‐duration ablation. Thirty‐five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion.ResultsA total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p < .001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p < .001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p < .001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p < .001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p < .001).ConclusionHFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3