Human factors in anaesthesia: a narrative review

Author:

Kelly F. E.1ORCID,Frerk C.23,Bailey C. R.4,Cook T. M.15,Ferguson K.6,Flin R.7,Fong K.89,Groom P.10,John C.11,Lang A. R.12,Meek T.13,Miller K. L.14,Richmond L.15,Sevdalis N.16,Stacey M. R.17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust Bath UK

2. Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Northampton General Hospital Northampton UK

3. College of Life Sciences/Leicester Medical School University of Leicester UK

4. Department of Anaesthetics Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK

5. School of Medicine Bristol University Bristol UK

6. Department of Anaesthesia Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Aberdeen UK

7. School of Psychology, Aberdeen Business School Robert Gordon University Aberdeen UK

8. Department of Anaesthesia University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London UK

9. Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy University College London UK

10. Department of Anaesthesia Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Liverpool UK

11. Department of Anaesthesia University College Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust London UK

12. Human Factors Research Group, Faculty of Engineering University of Nottingham UK

13. Department of Anaesthesia James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough UK

14. Department of Anaesthesia Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK

15. Department of Anaesthesia Swansea Bay University Health Board Swansea UK

16. Centre for Implementation Science King's College London UK

17. Department of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK

Abstract

SummaryHealthcare relies on high levels of human performance, as described by the ‘human as the hero’ concept. However, human performance varies and is recognised to fall in high‐pressure situations, meaning that it is not a reliable method of ensuring safety. Other safety‐critical industries embed human factors principles into all aspects of their organisations to improve safety and reduce reliance on exceptional human performance; there is potential to do the same in anaesthesia. Human factors is a broad‐based scientific discipline which aims to make it as easy as possible for workers to do things correctly. The human factors strategies most likely to be effective are those which ‘design out’ the chance of an error or adverse event occurring. When errors or adverse events do happen, barriers are in place to trap them and reduce the risk of progression to patient and/or worker harm. If errors or adverse events are not trapped by these barriers, mitigations are in place to minimise the consequences. Non‐technical skills form an important part of human factors barriers and mitigation strategies and include: situation awareness; decision‐making; task management; and team working. Human factors principles are not a substitute for proper investment and appropriate staffing levels. Although applying human factors science has the potential to save money in the long term, its proper implementation may require investment before reward can be reaped. This narrative review describes what is known about human factors in anaesthesia to date.

Funder

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

King's College London

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference118 articles.

1. International Ergonomics Association.What is ergonomics (HFE)?https://iea.cc/what‐is‐ergonomics(accessed 07/11/2022).

2. Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors.Human factors in health and social care.2018.https://ergonomics.org.uk/resource/human‐factors‐in‐health‐and‐social‐care.html(accessed 07/11/2022).

3. The Health Foundation. Clinical Human Factors Group.https://www.health.org.uk/funding‐and‐partnerships/programmes/clinical‐human‐factors‐group?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI7q‐O6eOR‐AIVjJftCh0JlAzxEAAYASAAEgLRDfD_BwE(accessed 07/11/2022).

4. Achieving risk reduction, effectively;Manuele FA;Human Factors Management,2006

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3