Affiliation:
1. Management Science Department, Darla Moore School of Business University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA
2. Department of Management, Robinson College of Business Georgia State University Atlanta Georgia USA
Abstract
AbstractBusiness schools have significantly increased the percentage of teaching‐focused faculty (defined here as full‐time faculty with doctorates not on the tenure track) over the last decades. However, many schools have not adequately updated their policies to support these faculty, leading some teaching‐focused faculty to feel like second‐class citizens. In this article, we provide a literature review of teaching‐focused faculty hiring trends, challenges faced by teaching‐focused faculty and the institutions that hire them, and proposed improvements to these challenges. Next, we draw from these best practices provided in the literature, as well as from first‐person interviews, to share how business schools address these challenges. Specifically, we use interviews from decision makers (current and former deans) to examine how schools approach hiring and supporting teaching‐focused faculty. Our study shows improved institutional support and acceptance of teaching‐focused faculty over the past two decades, but with room for continued improvement. We conclude by arguing that TF faculty should be treated as strategic assets within schools in order to support collegiality, acceptance, and professional respect, while also enhancing students’ learning opportunities. In doing so, we hope to start a discussion of best practices that can better equip schools to provide institutional support to teaching‐focused faculty.
Subject
Decision Sciences (miscellaneous),Education,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference38 articles.
1. American Association for University Professors. (2018)Data snapshot: Contingent faculty in US higher ed.AAUP Updates. Retrieved fromhttps://www.aaup.org/news/data‐snapshot‐contingent‐faculty‐us‐higher‐ed#.W8VOm2hKhPZ
2. Navigating Disruptive Innovation in Undergraduate Business Education
3. Reclaiming the Public Trust