Clinical practice guidelines: Their utility, dissemination and monitoring at Colonial War Memorial Hospital: A mixed methods study from Fiji

Author:

Krishna Ashnita A.12ORCID,Kado Sinead3ORCID,Dubey Alok4ORCID,Grant Cameron5ORCID,Kado Joseph6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Paediatrics Colonial War Memorial Hospital Suva Fiji

2. College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Fiji National University Suva Fiji

3. Health Professions Education Unit, School of Allied Health University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

4. College of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences Fiji National University Suva Fiji

5. Department of Paediatrics, Child and Youth Health University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

6. Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) improve patient care by standardising medical practice. However, little is known about their applicability in low‐resource settings. Since 2010, Fiji has introduced guidelines to increase the application of evidence‐based practice.AimsWe describe the dissemination, utility and monitoring of guideline implementation in Fiji, a low‐resource setting in the Pacific.MethodsA mixed‐methods design included a survey and focus groups. All 178 doctors in five departments at Fiji's largest tertiary hospital were invited to participate. Subsequently, two focus group interviews explored clinicians' perspectives in more detail. Analysis included data description, multi‐variable logistic, multinomial regression and manifest content analyses.ResultsThe response rate was 74%. Most doctors agreed that CPGs were good for patient management (100%), doctors continuing medical education (CME) (96%), patient education (73%), supported by systematic reviews (91%) and consistent with existing norms/values (83%). Ninety‐five per cent stated that CPGs increased the quality of care, and 80% stated that CPGs increased physician satisfaction. Approximately two‐thirds stated that CPGs decreased medical‐legal problems (63%) and malpractice suits (68%). Sixty to 90% of doctors disagreed that CPGs were oversimplified/cookbook medicine (60%), too rigid to apply individually (65%), challenged physician autonomy (60%) or were ambiguous/unclear (86%) or not practical (89%). The preferred method of dissemination was CME, and quick reference guides were best for implementation. No formal CPG monitoring existed in any department.ConclusionMost physicians found CPGs to be valuable for improving the consistency of care. In low‐resource settings, dissemination of guidelines should be paired with CME to improve their uptake. Increased monitoring of guideline use appears necessary.

Funder

Fiji National University

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3