Supporting conservationists’ mental health through better working conditions

Author:

Pienkowski Thomas123ORCID,Keane Aidan2ORCID,Castelló y Tickell Sofia1,de Lange Emiel12ORCID,Hazenbosch Mirjam1,Khanyari Munib145,Arlidge William N. S.167ORCID,Baranyi Gergő8,Brittain Stephanie1ORCID,Kapoor Vena5,Mohan Vik9,Papworth Sarah10ORCID,Ravi Roshni5,Smit Izak P. J.1112,Milner‐Gulland E. J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology University of Oxford Oxford UK

2. School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

3. Centre for Environmental Policy Imperial College London London UK

4. School of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK

5. Nature Conservation Foundation Mysore India

6. Department of Fish Biology, Fisheries and Aquaculture Leibniz‐Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Berlin Germany

7. Faculty of Life Sciences Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

8. Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, School of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

9. Blue Ventures Conservation Bristol UK

10. Department of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham UK

11. Scientific Services Garden Route and Frontier Node South African National Parks George South Africa

12. Sustainability Research Unit Nelson Mandela University George South Africa

Abstract

AbstractBiodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists’ mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists’ job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university‐level education, were in desk‐based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation‐specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early‐career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence‐based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists’ mental health and abilities to protect nature.

Funder

Natural Environment Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3