Patient experiences during the planned perioperative care pathway: An integrative review

Author:

Bur J. A.1ORCID,Wilson N. J.1ORCID,Lewis P. R.1ORCID,Missen K.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Western Sydney University Richmond New South Wales Australia

2. School of Healthcare Federation University Churchill Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimsThis integrative review aimed to synthesize evidence about the patients' experiences during the planned perioperative care pathway.DesignIntegrative review.Data SourcesCumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline Ovid, Scopus, and American Psychological Association (APA) PsychINFO. Original, peer‐reviewed studies published in English between 2012 and 2023 exploring patient experiences during the planned perioperative care pathway were reviewed.MethodsThis review was guided by the Whittemore and Knafl method and followed PRISMA guidelines to search the literature. Twenty‐two articles were selected for the final study.ResultsThree themes emerged: Sharing of information is empowering; interpersonal relationships are valued by patients, and hospital systems and care co‐ordination influence the patient experience.ConclusionsThe quality and consistency of the information patients receive can both support and undermine patient confidence in health professionals. The quality of relationships that participants experience and effective communication with health professionals can support or compromise the quality of the patients' perioperative experience. The nature of the hospital systems and care co‐ordination in hospital has implications for the quality of recovery from surgery.ImpactThis review evaluates whether national and international health services and organizations, adhering to the WHO guidelines, have developed and implemented intentionally focused perioperative care with the aims to achieving effective and sustainable surgical outcomes through increased patient satisfaction.No Patient or Public ContributionThis article is an integrative review and does not include patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference68 articles.

1. A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Patient Experiences of Pain Before and After Spine Surgery

2. Older Patients' Worries in Connection With General Anesthesia and Surgery—A Qualitative Study

3. The meaning of person-centred care in the perioperative nursing context from the patient's perspective - an integrative review

4. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Council. (2021).A framework for periopertive care in Australia and New Zealand.https://www.anzca.edu.au/safety‐advocacy/standards‐of‐practice/the‐perioperative‐care‐framework

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3