Affiliation:
1. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin‐Madison 1630 Linden Dr. Madison WI 53706 USA
2. Atmospheric, Climate, & Earth Sciences Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354 USA
3. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 8800 Greenbelt Road, Mail code: 610.1 Greenbelt MD 20771 USA
4. Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia 291 McCormick Road Charlottesville VA 22904 USA
5. Uryu Experimental Forest Hokkaido University Moshiri Horokanai Hokkaido 074‐0741 Japan
6. Data Science Institute University of Wisconsin‐Madison 447 Lorch Ct Madison 53706 WI USA
Abstract
Summary
Leaf traits are essential for understanding many physiological and ecological processes. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) models with leaf spectroscopy are widely applied for trait estimation, but their transferability across space, time, and plant functional types (PFTs) remains unclear.
We compiled a novel dataset of paired leaf traits and spectra, with 47 393 records for > 700 species and eight PFTs at 101 globally distributed locations across multiple seasons. Using this dataset, we conducted an unprecedented comprehensive analysis to assess the transferability of PLSR models in estimating leaf traits.
While PLSR models demonstrate commendable performance in predicting chlorophyll content, carotenoid, leaf water, and leaf mass per area prediction within their training data space, their efficacy diminishes when extrapolating to new contexts. Specifically, extrapolating to locations, seasons, and PFTs beyond the training data leads to reduced R2 (0.12–0.49, 0.15–0.42, and 0.25–0.56) and increased NRMSE (3.58–18.24%, 6.27–11.55%, and 7.0–33.12%) compared with nonspatial random cross‐validation. The results underscore the importance of incorporating greater spectral diversity in model training to boost its transferability.
These findings highlight potential errors in estimating leaf traits across large spatial domains, diverse PFTs, and time due to biased validation schemes, and provide guidance for future field sampling strategies and remote sensing applications.
Funder
National Science Foundation
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献