Unveiling the transferability of PLSR models for leaf trait estimation: lessons from a comprehensive analysis with a novel global dataset

Author:

Ji Fujiang1ORCID,Li Fa1ORCID,Hao Dalei2ORCID,Shiklomanov Alexey N.3ORCID,Yang Xi4ORCID,Townsend Philip A.1ORCID,Dashti Hamid1ORCID,Nakaji Tatsuro5ORCID,Kovach Kyle R.1ORCID,Liu Haoran1ORCID,Luo Meng1ORCID,Chen Min16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin‐Madison 1630 Linden Dr. Madison WI 53706 USA

2. Atmospheric, Climate, & Earth Sciences Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354 USA

3. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 8800 Greenbelt Road, Mail code: 610.1 Greenbelt MD 20771 USA

4. Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia 291 McCormick Road Charlottesville VA 22904 USA

5. Uryu Experimental Forest Hokkaido University Moshiri Horokanai Hokkaido 074‐0741 Japan

6. Data Science Institute University of Wisconsin‐Madison 447 Lorch Ct Madison 53706 WI USA

Abstract

Summary Leaf traits are essential for understanding many physiological and ecological processes. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) models with leaf spectroscopy are widely applied for trait estimation, but their transferability across space, time, and plant functional types (PFTs) remains unclear. We compiled a novel dataset of paired leaf traits and spectra, with 47 393 records for > 700 species and eight PFTs at 101 globally distributed locations across multiple seasons. Using this dataset, we conducted an unprecedented comprehensive analysis to assess the transferability of PLSR models in estimating leaf traits. While PLSR models demonstrate commendable performance in predicting chlorophyll content, carotenoid, leaf water, and leaf mass per area prediction within their training data space, their efficacy diminishes when extrapolating to new contexts. Specifically, extrapolating to locations, seasons, and PFTs beyond the training data leads to reduced R2 (0.12–0.49, 0.15–0.42, and 0.25–0.56) and increased NRMSE (3.58–18.24%, 6.27–11.55%, and 7.0–33.12%) compared with nonspatial random cross‐validation. The results underscore the importance of incorporating greater spectral diversity in model training to boost its transferability. These findings highlight potential errors in estimating leaf traits across large spatial domains, diverse PFTs, and time due to biased validation schemes, and provide guidance for future field sampling strategies and remote sensing applications.

Funder

National Science Foundation

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3