Affiliation:
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
2. Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
3. Department of Medical‐Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
4. Razi Clinical Research Development Unit, Razi Hospital Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
5. Department of Nursing Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences Esfarayen Iran
6. Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
Abstract
AbstractBurn injuries, as a major public health problem, can lead to high morbidity and mortality. Burns is considered as one of the most devastating injuries globally and the fourth most common injury after traffic accidents, falls and interpersonal violence. Burn injuries can affect human life, such as physical and mental health, functional skills, and performance. Changes in appearance, social isolation, stress, anxiety, depression, low self‐esteem, unemployment, financial burden and family problems can occur in these patients. These burn complications can be exacerbated without adequate social support. This systematic review evaluated burn patients' social support and related factors. A systematic search was performed on the international electronic databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as ‘Burns’, ‘Social support’, ‘Perceived social support’ and ‘Social care’ from the earliest to 30 April 2022. The quality of the included studies in this review was assessed using the appraisal tool for cross‐sectional studies (AXIS tool). A total of 1677 burn patients were included in this review from 12 studies. Mean score of social support in burn patients based on multidimensional scale of perceived social support, Phillips's social support questionnaire, social support questionnaire, social support scale and Norbeck social support questionnaire were 5.04 (SD = 1.59) of 7, 22.06 (SD = 3.05), 78.20 (SD = 15.00) of 95, 82.24 (SD = 13.70) and 4.14 (SD = 0.99), respectively. Factors such as income, educational attainment, burn surface area, reconstructive surgery, quality of life, self‐esteem, socialisation, posttraumatic growth, spirituality, and ego resilience had a significant positive relationship with social support of burns patients. Social support in patients with burn had a significant negative relationship with factors such as psychological distress, having children, life satisfaction, neuroticism and post‐traumatic stress disorder. Overall, patients with burns had moderate levels of social support. Therefore, it is recommended that health policymakers and managers make it easier for burn patients to adapt to burns by providing psychological intervention programs and the social support needed by burn patients.
Reference82 articles.
1. Analysis of death in burn cases with special reference to age, sex and complications
2. A systematic review of self-esteem and related factors among burns patients
3. Evaluating the knowledge and attitudes of the members of the medical community mobilization on first aid for burn injuries in Guilan, Iran;Mobayen M;J Maz Univ Med,2020
4. Effect of early grafting on improvement of lethal area index (la50) in burn patients: a 7‐year investigation in a burn referral Centre in the north of Iran;Mobayen M;Ann Burns Fire Disasters,2017
5. Mortality and Morbidity of Fireworks-Related Burns on the Annual Last Wednesday of the Year Festival (Charshanbeh Soori) in Iran: An 11-Year Study