Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study

Author:

Greco Alessandro1,Mastronicola Diego1,Pacini Francesco2,Giacomelli Luca3,Papa Simonetta3,Fiorentini Chiara4,David Valentina5,Rowan Sara6,Mennini Natascia7,Magnoni Cristina8,

Affiliation:

1. Outpatient Wound Care Centre Local Health Care System Frosinone Italy

2. IT Department Municipality of Prato Prato Italy

3. Polistudium SrL Milan Italy

4. Unit of Dermatologic Surgery University Hospital of Modena Modena Italy

5. Vascular Surgery Outpatient Local Health Care System Pescara Italy

6. Clinical Scientific Support Services Florence Italy

7. Department of Chemistry University of Florence Florence Italy

8. Unit of Dermatologic Surgery University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy

Abstract

AbstractEstablishing a common language that allows univocal and objective communication in describing wounds and their healing is of utmost importance in defining the diagnostic hypothesis and proper wound management. To measure the level of agreement on the description of wounds, an international study was performed among experts of different professional backgrounds on several common terms used to describe ulcerative lesions. A panel of 27 wound care experts anonymously completed a multiple‐choice questionnaire on 100 images of 50 ulcerative lesions. The participants were asked to describe each image using a set of pre‐defined terms. An expert data analyst interpreted the questionnaires to map the level of agreement on the used terminology. Our findings show a very low level of agreement among experts in using the proposed terminology to describe the wound bed, the wound edge, and the surrounding skin conditions. Efforts should be planned to find a consensus on the correct use of terminology for wound description. To this aim, partnership, consensus, and agreement with educators in medicine and nursing are necessary.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3