Navigating through learning tensions at the front end: How firms can motivate paradoxical thinking when screening the creativity of ideas

Author:

Röth Tobias1ORCID,Heidenreich Sven2,Schweitzer Fiona3ORCID,Spieth Patrick1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Innovation Management and Entrepreneurship University of Kassel Mönchebergstr. 1 34125 Kassel Germany

2. Technology and Innovation Management Saarland University P.O. 15 11 50 66041 Saarbrücken Germany

3. Marketing Department Grenoble Ecole de Management 12 rue Pierre Sémard 38000 Grenoble France

Abstract

Idea screening is crucial as it must select the most promising ideas that are best suited to increase front‐end success. Although paradox theory indicates that learning tensions characterize the evaluation and screening of idea creativity, we know little about how idea screeners navigate through the associated competing demands. In response, we investigate the effects of idea screeners' paradoxical thinking on the assessment of the creativity of ideas as well as its motivational antecedents of paradoxical thinking. By analyzing a survey (N = 326) and an experiment (N = 292), we show that paradoxical thinking increases front‐end success and both dimensions of idea creativity (encompassing meaningfulness and novelty). In turn, by creating a motivational context (comprising decision autonomy, encouragement to take risks, and tolerance for mistakes), firms can provide the antecedents to adopt paradoxical thinking. Our study contributes to and extends the literature on screening idea creativity and paradox theory.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference71 articles.

1. Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross‐disciplinary integrative review;Acar O.A.;Journal of Management,2019

2. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations;Amabile T.;Research in Organizational Behavior,1988

3. Turning the sword: How NPD teams cope with front‐end tensions;Andriopoulos C.;Journal of Product Innovation Management,2018

4. Exploitation‐exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation;Andriopoulos C.;Organization Science,2009

5. Organizational autonomy: A review and agenda for future research;Arregle J.L.;Journal of Management,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3