Escaping iatrogenic harm: A journey into mental health service avoidance

Author:

Aves Wren

Abstract

Accessible SummaryWhat is known on the subject? Little is known about how mental health services can cause harm in ways other than medication, talking therapies, diagnosis and detention under the Mental Health Act. The outcomes of people who avoid seeking help from mental health services due to previous experiences of harm are not well known. What this article adds to existing knowledge? I provide a first‐person perspective of experiences of harm within mental health services, how this impacted my care, the long‐term effects of the harm on my well‐being and my ongoing experiences of avoiding mental health services. What are the implications for mental health nursing? Healthcare professionals should be aware of the multitude of ways service provision can harm patients, and how, unknown to professionals, patients may create an internal understanding of how to best navigate harmful service environments. Healthcare professionals should have a deeper understanding of the reasons why people may choose not to engage with mental health services, and what impact this may have on them. AbstractThe recent announcement of the first ever statutory public inquiry into a UK mental health service indicates a growing recognition of iatrogenic harm in mental healthcare. Despite the potential for harm across all services and practices, restrictive practices, psychotherapy, diagnosis and psychiatric medications are often the only areas of mental healthcare given significant attention. While the topic is widely discussed in survivor communities, accounts of harm caused by the everyday workings of services, including team cultures, administrative processes and staff–patient interactions, are missing from academic literature. In this article, I describe my 10‐year journey through mental health services, and how everyday practices, cultures and staff behaviour deeply impacted my ability to receive appropriate care, replicated previously traumatic environments, and damaged my mental health. Taking steps to protect myself from further harm, I self‐discharged and am currently living as a ‘service‐avoider’. The ongoing implications of this decision and the long‐term impacts of harm are discussed.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference10 articles.

1. Gripped by fear: The invisible crisis in eating disorders services;Barzdaitiene D.;RCPsych Medical Psychotherapy Faculty Newsletter Autumn/Winter,2022

2. G.(2020).Neorecovery neoliberalism and enforced ‘positive’ risk taking recovery in the bin.https://recoveryinthebin.org/2020/03/05/neorecovery‐neoliberalism‐and‐enforced‐positive‐risk‐taking/

3. Self‐care as care left undone? The ethics of the self‐care agenda in contemporary healthcare policy

4. Hibbins J.(2022).The myth that “When someone is asking for help they don't really want to end their life”’ saving lives blog.https://www.savinglives.blog/uncategorized/the‐myth‐that‐when‐someone‐is‐asking‐for‐help‐they‐dont‐really‐want‐to‐end‐their‐life/

5. Regulating “untrustworthy patients”: Constructions of “trust” and “distrust” in accounts of inpatient treatment for anorexia

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3