Simple radiologic assessment of visceral obesity and prediction of surgical morbidity in endometrial cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic aortic lymphadenectomy: A reliability and accuracy study

Author:

Correa‐Paris Alejandro1ORCID,Gorraiz Ochoa Verónica1,Hernandez Gutiérrez Alicia2ORCID,Gilabert Estellés Juan34ORCID,Díaz‐Feijoo Berta1ORCID,Gil‐Moreno Antonio15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

2. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid Spain

3. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital General de Valencia Valencia Spain

4. University of Valencia Valencia Spain

5. Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca Barcelona Spain

Abstract

AbstractAimTo evaluate the reliability of sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD)—a surrogate of visceral obesity—in magnetic resonance imaging, and its accuracy to predict the surgical morbidity of aortic lymphadenectomy.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter reliability (phase 1) and accuracy (phase 2) cohort study in three Spanish referral hospitals. We retrospectively analyzed data from the STELLA‐2 randomized controlled trial that included high‐risk endometrial cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical staging. Patients were classified into subgroups: conventional versus robotic‐assisted laparoscopy, and transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal technique. In the first phase, we measured the agreement of three SAD measurements (at the umbilicus, renal vein, and inferior mesenteric artery) and selected the most reliable one. In phase 2, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of SAD to predict surgical morbidity. Surgical morbidity was the main outcome measure, it was defined by a core outcome set including variables related to blood loss, operative time, surgical complications, and para‐aortic lymphadenectomy difficulty.ResultsIn phase 1, all measurements showed good inter‐rater and intra‐rater agreement. Umbilical SAD (u‐SAD) was the most reliable one. In phase 2, we included 136 patients. u‐SAD had a good diagnostic accuracy to predict surgical morbidity in patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (0.73 in ROC curve). It performed better than body mass index and other anthropometric measurements. We calculated a cut‐off point of 246 mm (sensitivity: 0.56, specificity: 0.80).Conclusionsu‐SAD is a simple, reliable, and potentially useful measurement to predict surgical morbidity in endometrial cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical staging, especially when facing transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3