Exploring women's bladder self‐care practices: A qualitative secondary analysis

Author:

Wyman Jean F.1ORCID,Burgio Kathryn L.23,Newman Diane K.4,Cunningham Shayna D.5,Hebert‐Beirne Jeni6,Low Lisa Kane7,Meister Melanie R.8,Stapleton Ann9,Gahagan Sheila10,Williams Beverly R.3,

Affiliation:

1. Adult and Gerontological Nursing Cooperative School of Nursing University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

2. Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine Birmingham Alabama USA

3. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham Alabama USA

4. Division of Urology Department of Surgery Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Public Health Sciences University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington Connecticut USA

6. Division of Community Health Sciences School of Public Health University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

7. Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences School of Nursing University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

8. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas USA

9. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

10. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine University of California San Diego California USA

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo describe women's experiences with a range of bladder self‐care practices.DesignWe conducted a secondary, directed content analysis of qualitative data from the Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities and Experiences, a multisite focus group study designed to explore adolescent and adult women's experiences, perceptions, beliefs, knowledge and behaviours related to bladder health. This study was conducted by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases' Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Research Consortium. Study methods were informed by the Consortium's conceptual framework, based on a social ecological model adapted from Glass and McAtee's Society‐Behavior‐Biology Nexus.MethodsParticipants were recruited at seven geographically diverse United States research centres between July 2017 and April 2018. Data for the current analysis were collected using a semi‐structured discussion group with 36 focus groups involving 316 community‐dwelling adult women aged 18–93 years. Coded text was re‐examined according to eight self‐care behavioural domains identified through literature review and expert opinion as potentially influencing bladder health.ResultsParticipants described many self‐care practices they had adopted to prevent bladder problems or manage existing symptoms and conditions. Eight themes were identified: ‘Choosing fluids, foods and medications’; ‘Dressing for bladder health’; ‘Promoting bodily cleanliness’; ‘Managing toileting environments’; ‘Timing when to void’; ‘Exercising pelvic floor muscles for bladder control’; ‘Limiting physical activities that challenge the bladder’ and ‘Staying home and navigating when away’. Thirteen subthemes were derived from five of the eight themes.ConclusionWomen use a broad array of self‐care practices related to their bladder health. Research is needed to examine the efficacy of self‐care behaviours for preventing or managing bladder symptoms and conditions, and to discern potential risks. Results have important implications for development of bladder health promotion interventions and public health messaging around women's bladder health.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThis study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding women's bladder self‐care practices, which can be used by clinicians and public health professionals in designing interventions to promote bladder health and function.ImpactWomen with and without lower urinary tract symptoms use a broad range of self‐care practices that may affect their bladder health, including some that may be harmful. Because of the high prevalence of bladder symptoms in women, this study may help patient assessment and counselling regarding self‐care practices.Reporting MethodThis study was reported according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3