Affiliation:
1. School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT UK
2. Department of Earth Science and Environmental Change University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
3. Department of Geography and GIS University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
4. Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
5. Ven Te Chow Hydrosystems Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
6. School of Ocean Sciences Bangor University Menai Bridge LL59 5AB UK
7. Institute of Geological Sciences Jagiellonian University Gronostajowa 3a Kraków PL‐30‐387 Poland
Abstract
ABSTRACTSole structures on the base of turbidites, and other bed types, are typically classified into scour marks and tool marks, such as flutes, grooves, skim marks and prod marks. Yet, there are a range of other common sole marks that are unrelated to scouring or tools, and whose origin is poorly understood. Prominent among these sole structures are longitudinal ridges and furrows, and ‘dinosaur leather’ structures associated with mud ripples. Herein, these features are described and it is argued that they are the product of deformation of the substrate during a sediment gravity flow event. In these flow‐induced interfacial deformation structures (FIDS), a soft cohesive substrate undergoes deformation in response to a buoyant force induced by the denser basal component of an overriding flow, and the flow interacts with this buoyant deformation through shear to remould the substrate. Variations in the relative strength of these buoyant and shear‐induced forces explain the wide range of FIDS that can form. This FIDS model reinterprets the formation of longitudinal ridges and furrows, which have previously been classified as scour marks, and explains their distinctive spatial patterns. Furthermore, the new model builds on the seminal work of Dżułyński and colleagues in the 1960s and 1970s, who identified that these structures contain key palaeocurrent information, and it is argued that such information is largely under‐utilized. Importantly, alongside their utility as palaeocurrent indicators, FIDS provide insights into the rheology of the substrate at the time of their formation, and thus the nature of basal flow conditions in the formative flows.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Reference135 articles.
1. Note on the use of plaster of paris in flow visualization, and some geological applications
2. Erosional current marks of weakly cohesive beds;Allen J.R.L.;J. Sed. Petrol.,1969
3. Transverse erosional marks of mud and rock: their physical basis and geological significance
4. Mixing at turbidity current heads, and its geological implications;Allen J.R.L.;J. Sed. Petrol.,1971
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献