Changes in perinatal management and outcomes of extremely preterm infants born below 26 weeks of gestation in a tertiary referral hospital in Sweden: Comparison between 2004–2007 and 2012–2016

Author:

Aronsson Emma1ORCID,Holzmann Malin12ORCID,Bartocci Marco23ORCID,Hulthén Varli Ingela12ORCID,Saltvedt Sissel12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pregnancy Care and Delivery Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

2. Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

3. Department of Neonatology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPerinatal management of extremely preterm births in Sweden has changed toward active care from 22–23 gestational weeks during the last decades. However, considerable regional differences exist. This study evaluates how one of the largest perinatal university centers has adapted to a more active care between 2004–2007 and 2012–2016 and if this has influenced infant survival.Material and methodsIn this historical cohort study, women admitted with at least one live fetus and delivered at 22–25 gestational weeks (stillbirths included) at Karolinska University Hospital Solna during April 1, 2004–March 31, 2007, and January 1, 2012–December 31, 2016, were compared regarding rates of obstetric and neonatal interventions, and infant mortality and morbidity. Maternal, pregnancy and infant data from 2004–2007 were obtained from the Extreme Preterm Infants in Sweden Study while data from 2012–2016 were extracted from medical journals and quality registers. The same definitions of interventions and diagnoses were used for both study periods.ResultsA total of 106 women with 118 infants during 2004–2007 and 213 women with 240 infants during 2012–2016 were included. Increases between the study periods were seen regarding cesarean delivery (overall rate 14% [17/118] during 2004–2007 vs. 45% [109/240] during 2012–2016), attendance of a neonatologist at birth (62% [73/118] vs. 85% [205/240]) and surfactant treatment at birth in liveborn infants (60% [45/75] vs. 74% [157/211]). Antepartum stillbirth rate decreased (13% [15/118] vs. 5% [12/240]) and the proportion of live births increased (80% [94/118] vs. 88% [211/240]) while 1‐year survival (64% [60/94] vs. 67% [142/211]) and 1‐year survival without major neonatal morbidity (21% [20/94] vs. 21% [44/211]) among liveborn infants did not change between the study periods. At 22 gestational weeks, interventions rates were still low during 2012–2016, most obvious regarding antenatal steroid treatment (23%), attendance of a neonatologist (51%), and intubation at birth (24%).ConclusionsBoth obstetric and neonatal interventions at births below 26 gestational weeks increased between 2004–2007 and 2012–2016 in this single center study; however, at 22 gestational weeks they were still at a low level during 2012–2016. Despite more infants being born alive, 1‐year survival did not increase between the study periods.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3