Motivations for blood donation by HIV‐positive individuals on antiretrovirals in South Africa: A qualitative study

Author:

van den Berg Karin123,Murphy Edward L.456,Louw Vernon J.2,Maartens Gary7,Hughes Shana D.6

Affiliation:

1. Medical Division South African National Blood Service Roodepoort South Africa

2. Division of Clinical Haematology, Department of Medicine University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa

3. Division of Clinical Haematology University of the Free State Bloemfontein South Africa

4. Department of Laboratory Medicine University of California, San Franciscco San Francisco California USA

5. Department of Epidemiology/Biostatistics University of California, San Franciscco San Francisco California USA

6. Epidemiology and Bioinformatics Core Vitalant Research Institute San Francisco California USA

7. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesWe performed a mixed‐methods study to explore the motivations associated with blood donation by donors with known, but undisclosed HIV‐positive status and ARV use (HIV+/ARV+), seeking potential strategies to reduce such donations and mitigate risk for blood recipients. Here, we report predominantly the qualitative component.BackgroundA safe and sustainable blood supply is dependent in part, on effective pre‐donation donor assessment. We previously described failure by HIV+/ARV+ blood donors to disclose their status. Such donations may lead to transfusion‐transmitted HIV.MethodsThe social ecological model provided the conceptual framework for this study. Previously identified HIV+/ARV+ donors were invited to complete a survey (including a validated stigma scale) and qualitative interview, which underwent inductive and deductive thematic analysis.ResultsWe uncovered two primary motivational paths to HIV+/ARV+ blood donations: privacy and altruism. The latter included a motivation not previously reported in the literature: donating specifically for other people living with HIV (PLWH). The other primary factor was a lack of privacy. These accounts often included donors encountering donation opportunities when accompanied by people to whom they had not and did not plan to disclose their HIV status. Most were highly confident their donations would be identified as HIV‐positive and discarded.ConclusionWe demonstrated a complex interaction between individual, social, cultural, and structural/policy factors in blood donations by PLWH who take ARV. Recommendations to limit HIV + ARV+ donations include: (1) Targeted communication strategies to increase knowledge among PLWH of their deferral from blood donation—without increasing stigma, and (2) development of procedures to assist those who feel unable to opt‐out of donation due to privacy concerns.

Funder

Fogarty International Center

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Hematology

Reference57 articles.

1. Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics

2. Transfusion‐associated (T‐A)‐AIDS in the United States;Ward JW;Dev Biol Stand,1993

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3