Effects of altering diet carbohydrate profile and physical form on zoo‐housed giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata

Author:

Kearney Celeste C.1,Ball Ray L.2,Hall Mary Beth3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Animal Sciences University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

2. Busch Gardens Tampa Tampa Florida USA

3. U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center USDA‐Agricultural Research Service Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractUnlike wild giraffe that primarily consume low starch browse, the preference of zoo‐housed giraffe for consuming supplemental feeds over forage could increase the risk of digestive disorders such as ruminal acidosis. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of modifying a supplemental feed's non‐fibre carbohydrate profile and physical form on nutritional, behavioural, and blood measures of giraffe in a zoological setting. Six non‐lactating, adult, female reticulated giraffes were used in a two‐pen modified reversal study using two dietary treatments in seven 21‐day periods with data collected on days 15–21. Dietary treatments were a control feed comprised of commercially available products used at the time as the giraffe feed (GF) and an unpelleted experimental feed (EF). On a dry matter basis, GF and EF, respectively, contained 17.0% and 17.4% crude protein, 14.2% and 1.5% starch, 14.9% and 21.3% ethanol‐soluble carbohydrates, 22.9% and 26.0% acid detergent fibre (ADF) and 9.50% and 14.9% ND‐soluble fibre (NDSF), with modulus of fineness values of 3.62 and 4.82. Supplemental feeds, alfalfa hay, salt, and water were available for ad libitum consumption. Significance was declared at p ≤ 0.05. Intakes of hay, supplemental feeds, and total feed did not differ by diet (p > 0.28), though intakes of starch (0.93 and 0.12 kg; p = 0.05) and ADF (1.83 and 2.23 kg; p = 0.04) differed between GF and EF respectively. Giraffe behaviour values (min/48 h) were greater with EF for total eating (p = 0.04); diets were not detected as different for engagement in oral stereotypes (GF = 433, EF = 318 min/48 h; p = 0.22). Blood glucose was higher on GF than EF (99.0 and 82.3 mg/dL; p = 0.03). The lower EF blood glucose value is more similar to ranges reported for domesticated ruminants. No differences were detected for changes in body weight or body condition score in the 21‐day periods (p > 0.32). Modification of supplemental feed carbohydrate profile and physical form can influence behaviour and blood glucose values of zoo‐housed giraffe.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference62 articles.

1. BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants

2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (1990).Official methods of analysis(15th ed.) AOAC International.

3. Feed selection and digestibility by captive giraffe

4. Morbidity and mortality related to hypoglycemia and chronic energy malnutrition in captive giraffe;Ball R. L.;Proceedings of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians,2002

5. A survey assessment of variables related to stereotypy in captive giraffe and okapi

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3