What Is Rural Well‐Being and How Is It Measured? An Attempt to Order Chaos*

Author:

Veréb Vanda1ORCID,Marques Carla1ORCID,Madureira Livia1ORCID,Marques Carlos1ORCID,Keryan Tigran1ORCID,Silva Rui12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Transdisciplinary Development Studies (CETRAD) University of Trás‐os‐Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD)

2. Research Centre for Business Sciences Research Centre (NECE‐UBI) University of Beira Interior

Abstract

AbstractWhile a substantial body of literature has been built on rural well‐being, due to the great heterogeneity of rural territories, the literature is highly fragmented, even contradictory. Moreover, no systematic review of the entire domain exists to guide rural decision‐makers. Debated conceptualization, contradicting results, and pressing policy requirements make it timely to deliver a systematized state‐of‐the‐art on rural well‐being to anchor public policies in the rural development domain. By systematically reviewing the scholarly literature on rural well‐being and all documents developed by government and private entities that academia highlighted as relevant to this subject, the study provides a bibliometric and thematic analysis of the domain without a time limit. Thirty‐three rural well‐being dimensions and over 9,000 indicators within these dimensions have been identified, their interconnections established and their relevance to international development goals highlighted. The study presents the structure and content of this indicator database and provides suggestions for rural researchers and policymakers on how to use it to build their own well‐being framework. It also provides an overview of each rural well‐being dimension by discussing the key theories, the main inconsistencies, the most relevant studies and authors, the fundamental measurement frameworks, and the indicators used.

Funder

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Publisher

Wiley

Reference223 articles.

1. Residential satisfaction in low-density Australian suburbs: The impact of social and physical context on neighbourhood contentment

2. Exploring subjective well-being and ecosystem services perception along a rural–urban gradient in the high Andes of Ecuador

3. Ahrendt D. Anderson R. Dubois H. Jungblut J.‐M. Leončikas T. Sándor E. &Pöntinen L.(2018).European Quality of Life 2016. Retrieved (https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/data/european‐quality‐of‐life‐survey).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3