Pain management inequities by demographic and geriatric‐related variables in older adult inpatients

Author:

Rambachan Aksharananda12ORCID,Neilands Torsten B.23,Karliner Leah24,Covinsky Kenneth56,Fang Margaret1,Nguyen Tung24

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

2. Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, Department of Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

3. Division of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

5. Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

6. Pepper Center, Department of Medicine UCSF San Francisco California USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPain is ubiquitous, yet understudied. The objective of this study was to analyze inequities in pain assessment and management for hospitalized older adults focusing on demographic and geriatric‐related variables.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study from January 2013 through September 2021 of all adults 65 years or older on the general medicine service at UCSF Medical Center. Primary exposures included (1) demographic variables including race/ethnicity and limited English proficiency (LEP) status and (2) geriatric‐related variables including age, dementia or mild cognitive impairment diagnosis, hearing or visual impairment, end‐of‐life care, and geriatrics consult involvement. Primary outcomes included (1) adjusted odds of numeric pain assessment versus other assessments and (2) adjusted opioids administered, measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME).ResultsA total of 15,809 patients were included across 27,857 hospitalizations with 1,378,215 pain assessments, with a mean age of 77.8 years old. Patients were 47.4% White, 26.3% with LEP, 49.6% male, and 50.4% female. Asian (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70–0.80), Latinx (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83–0.99), and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.93) patients had lower odds of a numeric assessment, compared with White patients. Patients with LEP (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.66–0.74) had lower odds of a numeric assessment, compared with English‐speaking patients. Patients with dementia, hearing impairment, patients 75+, and at end‐of‐life were all less likely to receive a numeric assessment. Compared with White patients (86 MME, 95% CI 77–96), Asian patients (55 MME, 95% CI 46–65) received fewer opioids. Patients with LEP, dementia, hearing impairment and those 75+ years old also received significantly fewer opioids.ConclusionOlder, hospitalized, general medicine patients from minoritized groups and with geriatric‐related conditions are uniquely vulnerable to inequitable pain assessment and management. These findings raise concerns for pain underassessment and undertreatment.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Hellman Foundation

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3