English tweets on allergy: Content analysis and association with surveillance data

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAnalysis of X (formerly Twitter) posts can inform on the interest/perceptions that social media users have on health subjects. In this study, we aimed to analyse tweets on allergic conditions, comparing them with surveillance data.MethodsWe retrieved tweets from England on “allergy,” “asthma,” and “allergic rhinitis,” published between 2016 and 2021. We estimated the correlation between the frequency of tweets on “asthma” and “allergic rhinitis” and English surveillance data on the incidence of asthma and allergic rhinitis medical visits. We performed sentiment analysis, computing a score informing on the emotional tone of assessed tweets. We applied a topic modelling approach to identify topics (clusters of words frequently occurring together) for tweets on each assessed condition.ResultsWe analysed a total of 13,605 tweets on “allergy,” 7767 tweets on “asthma,” and 11,974 tweets on “allergic rhinitis.” Food‐related words were preponderant on tweets on “allergy,” while “eyes” was the most frequent meaningful word on “allergy rhinitis” tweets. We observed seasonal patterns for tweets on “allergic rhinitis,” both in their frequency and sentiment – the incidence of allergic rhinitis medical visits was moderately to strongly correlated with the frequency (ρ = 0.866) and sentiment (ρ = −0.474) of tweets on “allergic rhinitis.” For tweets on “asthma,” no such patterns/correlations were observed. The average sentiment score was negative for all assessed conditions, ranging from −0.004 (“asthma”) to −0.083 (“allergic rhinitis”).ConclusionsTweets on “allergic rhinitis” displayed a seasonal pattern regarding their frequency and sentiment, which correlated with surveillance data. No such patterns were observed for “asthma.”