Asymmetry in political polarization at multiple levels of bias

Author:

Kluge Annika1ORCID,Adler Eli12ORCID,Nir Lilach34ORCID,Halperin Eran2ORCID,Sams Mikko15ORCID,Levy Jonathan1678ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering Aalto University Espoo Finland

2. Department of Psychology The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel

3. Department of Political Science Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel

4. Department of Communication Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem Israel

5. Aalto Studios – MAGICS Aalto University Espoo Finland

6. Department of Criminology Bar‐Ilan University Ramat Gan Israel

7. The Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center Bar‐Ilan University Ramat Gan Israel

8. Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology Reichman University Herzliya Israel

Abstract

AbstractWhile some studies show ideological asymmetry in outgroup bias between rightists and leftists, those studies often target an ideologically biased outgroup. Here, we bypass this issue by targeting the ideological outgroups (rightists for leftists, and leftists for rightists). We rely on a magnetoencephalography‐based approach delineating function‐specific neural mechanisms to test for ideological asymmetries at multiple levels: explicit psychological self‐reports, implicit behavioral bias, and neural oscillations. Using a computational model balancing the stimuli and screening 81 rightists and leftist Israeli individuals, we find ideological asymmetry with rightists being more biased at all three levels. Furthermore, the neural results add important insights by uncovering two underlying mechanisms: The first (late beta‐band motor activity) is strongly associated with implicit behavior, while the second (early alpha‐band dorsal anterior cingulate activity) reveal an antileftist bias for both groups. We discuss implications of the findings on bias, ideological asymmetry, their neural underpinnings, and social norms.

Funder

Suomen Kulttuurirahasto

Kulttuurin ja Yhteiskunnan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science;Journal of Social Issues;2024-09-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3