Economic evaluations of therapeutic drug monitoring interventions in acute hospital‐based settings: A systematic review

Author:

Carland Jane E.12ORCID,Carland David J.3,Brett Jonathan12ORCID,Stocker Sophie L.245ORCID,Roberts Darren M.126ORCID,Day Richard O.12ORCID,Laba Tracey‐Lea7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology St Vincent's Hospital Darlinghurst New South Wales Australia

2. School of Clinical Medicine, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Australian Resources Development Ltd Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. Edith Collins Centre, Drug Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Camperdown New South Wales Australia

7. UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimsTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) aims to optimize drug therapy. As demand on health resources increases, and the technology underpinning TDM becomes more sophisticated, the economic benefits of TDM in hospitals is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the economic evidence that could be used to support investment in TDM in hospital settings. In so doing, we sought to provide guidance for future economic evaluations.MethodsMedline, Embase, CENTRAL, Econlit and NHS Economic Evaluation databases were searched (inception to December 2022) for economic evaluations of hospital‐based TDM. Two authors reviewed the studies and extracted data. Overall quality of economic analysis reporting was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.ResultsTen prospective studies (including six randomized studies) and nine retrospective studies were eligible. Overall study reporting was poor, publications meeting a median (range) of 61% (46–82%) of CHEERS checklist criteria. An antimicrobial TDM intervention for adult patients was the focus of most studies (n = 18). Variable clinical outcomes were reported, and length of stay was the primary economic outcome for most studies (n = 13). The majority of studies determined that TDM was economically and clinically favourable (n = 14), four studies reporting a cost‐reduction in patient sub‐populations.ConclusionsSignificant improvements in both economic and clinical outcomes may be realized with TDM interventions, particularly when targeted to complex patient populations. Attainment of therapeutic target could serve as a feasible surrogate measure of benefit for hospital‐based TDM interventions. However, systematic reporting of economic outcomes is needed to inform investment decisions.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3